# Atom Registry Announces Major Protocol Upgrade on Atomos (Update) **URL:** \ **Category:** Conversation\ **Created:** [February 1, 2026, 12:48pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629 "2026-02-01T12:48:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![atomregistry](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/atomregistry/32/8832_2.png) [@atomregistry](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/atomregistry)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2026, 12:48pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/1 "2026-02-01T12:48:40Z")
**Atom Registry is testing a significant protocol upgrade on the Atomos blockchain, expanding the project from a basic on-chain naming system into a full-stack, decentralized domain infrastructure.** The upgrade introduces a modular smart-contract architecture built entirely with **CosmWasm** , enabling on-chain domain ownership, resolution, metadata, commerce, and security reputation — all enforced at the protocol level without custodians or off-chain dependencies. ### What’s New This upgrade transforms Atom Registry into a comprehensive domain economy with support for: - On-chain domain minting, ownership, and transfers - DNS-style and Web3-native resolution (including IPFS) - Standardized domain metadata profiles - Premium and multi-TLD support - A native on-chain marketplace for domain trading - A decentralized security and reputation layer (dSSL) Each function is implemented as an independent smart contract, allowing the system to scale and evolve without compromising core ownership guarantees. ### Deployed Smart Contracts - **Registry** – The canonical source of truth for domain ownership and transfers - **Registrar** – Controlled minting logic and pricing workflows - **TLD Manager** – Enables premium and multi-TLD registration with on-chain policies - **Resolver** – Maps domains to network resources (A, AAAA, CNAME, TXT, IPFS) - **Metadata** – Standardized, queryable domain profiles for UI and indexing - **Marketplace** – Trustless on-chain buying, selling, and bidding of domains - **dSSL Manager** – A decentralized security layer providing attestations, scoring, and revocation for domains via `cosmos.toml` Together, these contracts form a composable naming and identity protocol designed for long-term use across wallets, browsers, and decentralized applications. ### Why Cosmos and CosmWasm Atom Registry was built on **Cosmos** to take advantage of: - Deterministic execution and predictable fees - Fast finality and strong UX characteristics - Clean contract upgrade paths without state migration risk - Modular design through CosmWasm - Future interoperability via IBC These properties are essential for domain infrastructure, where assets are long-lived and protocol stability matters more than short-term throughput. ### Looking Ahead With this upgrade, Atom Registry is positioning itself as more than a naming service — it becomes the decentralized routing, commerce, and security layer for Web3 identity. Further tooling, integrations, and ecosystem partnerships are planned as the protocol matures with a strong interest in migrating directly into the Cosmos Hub for true decentralization and community governance. We have edited this post to honor a request to drop the One from Atomos One in our branding to avoid any confusion with existing Cosmos projects. Our position is that we are striving to bring value to Cosmos, and not inadvertently create any difficulty or conflict. Thanks! * * * ---
**Author:** ![Astratigos1999](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ba8739/32.png) [@Astratigos1999](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/Astratigos1999)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2026, 4:36pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/2 "2026-02-01T16:36:24Z")
my dumbass thought the title said “Atom One” xD ---
**Author:** ![atomregistry](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/atomregistry/32/8832_2.png) [@atomregistry](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/atomregistry)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2026, 6:28pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/3 "2026-02-01T18:28:52Z")
🤣 We went with Atomos because its original Greek for fundamental, indivisible building block. ---
**Author:** ![StakeLab](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/stakelab/32/4254_2.png) [@StakeLab](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/StakeLab)\ **Post date:** [February 4, 2026, 6:47pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/4 "2026-02-04T18:47:25Z")
Overall approving the proposition - but the addition of “One” is giving confusion with another ecosystem There might be a lot of project/external dependancies running on top of it right now, does it needs to be renamed or it’s mainly a codename? ---
**Author:** ![atomregistry](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/atomregistry/32/8832_2.png) [@atomregistry](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/atomregistry)\ **Post date:** [February 4, 2026, 8:18pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/5 "2026-02-04T20:18:29Z")
An adjustment to the name to just Atomos avoid brand confusion would be completely acceptable. Working alongside other projects is much more preferable to alienating anyone in the cosmosverse. ---
**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/uploads/cosmos1/original/2X/2/2a3beb3e0f97ddad3b51a8d0d4a22abaa95604d8.png) [@system](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/system)\ **Post date:** [April 5, 2026, 8:19pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/atom-registry-announces-major-protocol-upgrade-on-atomos-update/16629/6 "2026-04-05T20:19:28Z")
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.