# \[PROPOSAL #187\]\[ACCEPTED\] V9 Lambda upgrade (with Replicated Security)

**URL:** <https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-187-accepted-v9-lambda-upgrade-with-replicated-security/8766>\
**Category:** Software Upgrade\
**Tags:** accepted\
**Created:** [December 20, 2022, 9:07pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-187-accepted-v9-lambda-upgrade-with-replicated-security/8766 "2022-12-20T21:07:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 65

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lexa](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/lexa/32/7415_2.png) [@lexa](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/lexa)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2023, 3:27pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-187-accepted-v9-lambda-upgrade-with-replicated-security/8766/65 "2023-02-08T15:27:14Z")

</div>

A few respondents have asked about bugs found during Game of Chains and during the Replicated Security persistent testnet. I’ve compiled a list with links out to issues and commentary on Github, for the more technically inclined.

> [@Findings from Game of Chains and Beyond](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/findings-from-game-of-chains-and-beyond/9720):
>
> Introduction Game of Chains has wrapped up and we’re excited to present the results of approximately two months of testing on the technology behind Replicated Security. The findings from Game of Chains are the result of 90 validator teams and many core team members working together to stress-test the code behind Interchain Security. Many testing methods (model-based testing, code audits, etc) require the dev team to imagine all the things that could go wrong, but there can still be a big gap be…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-187-accepted-v9-lambda-upgrade-with-replicated-security/8766)._
