# \[PROPOSAL #54\]\[ACCEPTED\] Increase Max Validator Set Size to 150

**URL:** <https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958>\
**Category:** Parameter Change\
**Created:** [June 18, 2021, 11:27pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958 "2021-06-18T23:27:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:27pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/1 "2021-06-18T23:27:49Z")

</div>

Originally, the validator set size in the Cosmos Hub was capped at 100, ordered by total delegated Atoms.  
The Cosmos whitepaper stated that the validator set size should increase 13% per year until it hits 300 validators as a cap.

In July 2019, [proposal #10](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/10) suggested a new way to set the validator set size: through governance. This proposal also extended the active validator set size to 125, which still is the current network parameter.

Almost two years have been passed since this last set validator increase and the network has proven its reliability and stability. This proposal suggests increasing the validator set to 150 to improve network decentralization.

Other Cosmos-based networks, like Terra, have already raised the cap to 130 validators, proving that this parameter upgrade is feasible.

**Edit 29/08/2021:**  
**Proposal 54 is in the voting period:**

**Proposal link: [#54 Increase MaxValidators value Mintscan](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/54)**  
**Keplr link: [#54 Increase MaxValidators value Keplr](https://wallet.keplr.app/#/cosmoshub/governance?detailId=54)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2021, 11:32pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/2 "2021-07-02T23:32:34Z")

</div>

Any opinions or improvements regarding this proposal? I would like to read your thoughts 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DarkGhost7](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/darkghost7/32/1303_2.png) [@DarkGhost7](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/DarkGhost7)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2021, 5:11am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/3 "2021-07-12T05:11:34Z")

</div>

I would vote yes for this unless someone has good reasons why it shouldn’t be increased?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pacobits\_Stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/pacobits_stakely/32/1910_2.png) [@Pacobits\_Stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/Pacobits_Stakely)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2021, 3:35pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/4 "2021-07-12T15:35:49Z")

</div>

I think it is a good thing for the blockchain as it will improve decentralization and allow access to new players as validators.

It would be good to know the opinions of other validators about this proposal before launching it on the blockchain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jacobgadikian](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/jacobgadikian/32/6994_2.png) [@jacobgadikian](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/jacobgadikian)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2021, 11:39am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/5 "2021-07-19T11:39:40Z")

</div>

I’m personally in favor unless anybody thinks this slows the chain down too much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2021, 10:19pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/6 "2021-07-25T22:19:40Z")

</div>

Currently, the minimum stake to become a validator is 65k ATOM, which is $737K at current prices. Increasing the validator size to 150 would lower the barrier for new validators, and thus helping to decentralize the Cosmos Network.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StakeLab](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/stakelab/32/4254_2.png) [@StakeLab](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/StakeLab)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2021, 7:31am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/7 "2021-08-27T07:31:29Z")

</div>

Hello,

2 years ago in 2019, it was voted for 125 seats as the network could go without any problems to 180 seats.  
With the large amounts of new features and progress in the chain, I think it would be great to adjust to 150 as well.  
There are many new validators that are working well on others cosmos chains, that didn’t deploy yet on cosmos as there is no space for them.  
These 25 seats will be taken fast with the number of newcomers and builders in the ecosystem. A lot of more builders in the main chain can only be great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StakeLab](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/stakelab/32/4254_2.png) [@StakeLab](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/StakeLab)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2021, 7:34am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/8 "2021-08-27T07:34:07Z")

</div>

@iicc_stakely I can create the proposal and link to the draft so people will maybe be more active on this one. What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2021, 11:07am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/9 "2021-08-27T11:07:00Z")

</div>

I think that is a great idea, let’s try 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2021, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/10 "2021-08-29T16:03:19Z")

</div>

@StakeLab  
We deposited ATOM to the proposal, it is now live and ready to be voted 🔥

**Proposal link: [#54 Increase MaxValidators value Mintscan](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/54)**

**Keplr link: [#54 Increase MaxValidators value Keplr](https://wallet.keplr.app/#/cosmoshub/governance?detailId=54)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ronnydobbs](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/ronnydobbs/32/2024_2.png) [@ronnydobbs](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/ronnydobbs)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2021, 12:34am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/11 "2021-08-31T00:34:48Z")

</div>

This looks like a modest proposal to increase decentralization, and thus the power to scale the network’s capabilities. Certainly it will dilute governance pull and rewards of existing validators, but that is inevitable if we are to become competitive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![serejandmyself](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/serejandmyself/32/8086_2.png) [@serejandmyself](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/serejandmyself)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2021, 7:39pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/12 "2021-09-02T19:39:52Z")

</div>

Yes, yes and yes (and yes cause it has to be 20 characters)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silent](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/silent/32/2039_2.png) [@silent](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/silent)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2021, 12:29pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/13 "2021-09-04T12:29:11Z")

</div>

I’d like to try run a cosmos mainnet node if the mininum staking requirement is down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sleeky](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/sleeky/32/2040_2.png) [@sleeky](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/sleeky)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2021, 3:10pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/14 "2021-09-04T15:10:15Z")

</div>

is there any benefit for voting?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2021, 9:04pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/15 "2021-09-04T21:04:49Z")

</div>

Voting by itself has not any rewards (as far as I know), but having a participative community is crucial for having healthy governance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2021, 2:39pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/16 "2021-09-12T14:39:13Z")

</div>

The voting period will finish in less than two hours. It requires to reach at least 40% quorum to be valid and currently it is at 34.68%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iicc\_stakely](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/iicc_stakely/32/1909_2.png) [@iicc\_stakely](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/iicc_stakely)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2021, 4:09pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/17 "2021-09-12T16:09:28Z")

</div>

The proposal passed and it has become immediately effective 🥳. The number of active validators in the Cosmos Network is now 150. Thanks for the support!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mcanvar](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/mcanvar/32/2385_2.png) [@mcanvar](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/mcanvar)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2022, 8:14pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-54-accepted-increase-max-validator-set-size-to-150/4958/18 "2022-02-09T20:14:44Z")

</div>

Hello,

Is there any chance that we have another proposal to increase again? I believe there are plenty of candidates are waiting for this opportunity to join the network.

Thanks
