# \[PROPOSAL 797\] \[Passed\] - Increase the validator set of cosmos hub to 180 from 175

**URL:** <https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-797-passed-increase-the-validator-set-of-cosmos-hub-to-180-from-175/7283>\
**Category:** Parameter Change\
**Tags:** accepted\
**Created:** [September 21, 2022, 9:07am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-797-passed-increase-the-validator-set-of-cosmos-hub-to-180-from-175/7283 "2022-09-21T09:07:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 103

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![serejandmyself](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/serejandmyself/32/8086_2.png) [@serejandmyself](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/serejandmyself)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2023, 11:29am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-797-passed-increase-the-validator-set-of-cosmos-hub-to-180-from-175/7283/103 "2023-05-31T11:29:06Z")

</div>

As mentioned above Citizen Cosmos will vote YES. BTW, the essence of the prop looks a bit `meh`. I tried to explain what i mean [here](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/lets-discuss-the-slang-when-it-comes-to-inactive-validators/10764) - imo its about building a fairer approach to decentralizing stake.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-797-passed-increase-the-validator-set-of-cosmos-hub-to-180-from-175/7283)._
