# \[PROPOSAL #82\]\[REJECTED\] ATOM 2.0: A new vision for Cosmos Hub **URL:** https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-82-rejected-atom-2-0-a-new-vision-for-cosmos-hub/7328 **Category:** Signaling/Text **Tags:** rejected **Created:** [September 26, 2022, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-82-rejected-atom-2-0-a-new-vision-for-cosmos-hub/7328 "2022-09-26T16:03:13Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 57
### Author: ![andreas\_k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9d8465/32.png) [@andreas\_k](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/andreas_k) #### Post date: [October 3, 2022, 9:00am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-82-rejected-atom-2-0-a-new-vision-for-cosmos-hub/7328/57 "2022-10-03T09:00:10Z")
Once again an upcoming proposal has generated quality feedback and exchange of views here. After days of watching this discussion, my general feeling is that we are talking about something that can help grow the ecosystem, but there are a lot of things that need to be clarified and a few things that should definitely not happen… While I’m not in the mood to repeat concerns that have already been mentioned here, I can’t ignore the fact that this proposal essentially asks from ATOM stakers to bear all the risk and I have the impression that the proposers are not confident for many parameters… As for that sense of urgency, that’s not something I’m comfortable with… Sometimes it’s better to move slowly and with faith to follow ATOM’s consistent principles and I have the impression that this prop must definitely be redefined, with greater respect for ATOM holders. Otherwise, this proposal will probably do harm to the ecosystem and I completely agree with @johnniecosmos that the rewards should always flow in raw $ATOM, directly to staked holders. In my opinion this should be non-negotiable and anything different in this regard, could create bad results and rifts. Finally, as far as this > [@Youssef](#): > > We believe it doesn’t make sense anymore to have all ATOM holders vote for minor spending proposals. A qualified team from the community should be put in place that will handle directly those requests, removing burden from the shoulders of the community at large. I want to pretend that I never read it… A healthy community never cares about qualified teams and ‘‘honored’’ councils… In general, we always looking for additional ways to decentralize the voting power… Even the one who has only 1 ATOM counts, and WE should treat him with respect. This is what decentralization means… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-82-rejected-atom-2-0-a-new-vision-for-cosmos-hub/7328)._