# \[PROPOSAL #945\] \[VOTING\] CHIPs signaling phase: Permissionless ICS

**URL:** <https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-945-voting-chips-signaling-phase-permissionless-ics/14215>\
**Category:** CHIPs\
**Tags:** signaling-phase\
**Created:** [August 1, 2024, 10:49pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-945-voting-chips-signaling-phase-permissionless-ics/14215 "2024-08-01T22:49:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtremback](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/jtremback/32/605_2.png) [@jtremback](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/jtremback)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2024, 10:28pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-945-voting-chips-signaling-phase-permissionless-ics/14215/4 "2024-08-06T22:28:52Z")

</div>

Hey thanks, I am totally on board with not wanting spam. However, I think that in general spam should be filtered on frontends since they are more flexible and better equipped to do it. I cover this here: [CHIPs signaling phase: Forge (ICS launchpad)](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/chips-signaling-phase-forge-ics-launchpad/14161)

I’m proposing that initially a chain should have at least one validator opted in to be visible on the frontend, but this could be raised, or other conditions could be added.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-945-voting-chips-signaling-phase-permissionless-ics/14215)._