# \[Proposal ##\]\[LAST CALL 07/21/2023\] Launch Duality on Replicated Security

**URL:** <https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-last-call-07-21-2023-launch-duality-on-replicated-security/10932>\
**Category:** Add Consumer Chain\
**Created:** [June 23, 2023, 6:02pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-last-call-07-21-2023-launch-duality-on-replicated-security/10932 "2023-06-23T18:02:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 70

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![waqarmmirza](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/waqarmmirza/32/4189_2.png) [@waqarmmirza](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/waqarmmirza)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2023, 2:35pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-last-call-07-21-2023-launch-duality-on-replicated-security/10932/70 "2023-07-23T14:35:01Z")

</div>

> [@Elijah](#):
>
> The Multisig is made up of the top validators on the Cosmos Hub. While it’s not perfect and we specify that we are working on better solutions, you already trust these same people when transacting on the Hub.

But in case of daily transactions we are secured by the network and software, the worst a validator can do is get me slash 5% but in the case of multisig we are 100% relying on the intent of the validator (multisig) things are not same. I won’t argue that we should have a better escrow solution in a binary. But please don’t say that the situation is the same.

> [@Elijah](#):
>
> The criteria that people vote on is whether it benefits the Hub. The case made in the proposal is that by using community pool funds to temporarily LP, the Hub benefits because it :
> 
> 1. generates swap fees for the community pools (and staking fees if it’s an stATOM pair)
> 2. all MEV fees captured by the network accrue back to the Hub
> 3. the community pools still owns the funds (they are not being given to the chain)
> 4. would bootstrap a replicated security chain (a part of the ATOM Zone)
> 5. all gas fees created go to stakers and validators

Most of the validators are in loss, and the ICS is incurring more loss for validators, now situation is getting bit clear neutron is proving to be total loss for validator resources and now stride is not very different. Adding more chains on the expense of CP will not receive my favor unless we have a clear plan of support for validators.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-last-call-07-21-2023-launch-duality-on-replicated-security/10932)._