# Signalling Proposal to Whitelist the Deployment of InterChain NFT Contracts **URL:** \ **Category:** Hub Proposals\ **Created:** [November 19, 2024, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/signalling-proposal-to-whitelist-the-deployment-of-interchain-nft-contracts/14806 "2024-11-19T09:09:56Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 56
**Author:** ![waqarmmirza](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.cosmos.network/waqarmmirza/32/4189_2.png) [@waqarmmirza](https://forum.cosmos.network/u/waqarmmirza)\ **Post date:** [December 1, 2024, 6:09pm UTC](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/signalling-proposal-to-whitelist-the-deployment-of-interchain-nft-contracts/14806/56 "2024-12-01T18:09:02Z")
Now we have a new hub for minimalism (ATONE) and the Cosmos HUB community wants to evolve with use cases I will vote yes. But for the record, it is not among the use cases that were propagated in the discussion of Cosmwasm enabling prop. > [@\[PROPOSAL XX\] Signaling Proposal For Cosmos hub improvement - Permissioned CosmWasm](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-xx-signaling-proposal-for-cosmos-hub-improvement-permissioned-cosmwasm/12454): > > This proposal replaces proposal 893. Proposal 893 incorrectly has an IPFS hash in the description field. The actual proposal text is as follows, also viewable at [https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUxGC9G5Xx2XttCEThptaJuM3Gpn6xZJdXMRuu81Jguhf](https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUxGC9G5Xx2XttCEThptaJuM3Gpn6xZJdXMRuu81Jguhf)Permissioned CosmWasm Implementation on the Cosmos Hub The impending Cosmos Hub fork is opening new paths forward for $ATOM. As there is little need for both chains to be conservative and minimal in nature, now is the perfect time to introduce a permissioned implementa… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.cosmos.network/t/signalling-proposal-to-whitelist-the-deployment-of-interchain-nft-contracts/14806)._