I do appreciate the openness to feedback, after the Q&A (appreciate the invite btw) I had only a few concerns, but those mostly really only have to do with credibility of the professionals managing the indexes. But as to this point, I do see what you guys are trying to do very commendable and we do need indexes. My only feedback is the investment seeking of 2.5 million which is very high given the environment, the valuation based of quasar, and the token. Other than that I think you’re on a good path, and have the right mindset. It’s just my opinion at the end of the day, I don’t speak for the hub nor the validators. I think we need to see if you want to pass it 1. Less ask from the hub comp wise 2. Tokenization reconsideration 3. Realistic Valuation given the environment 4. Names and credentials of the fund managers. I think if you nail 3/4 it should pass with flying colors, look forward to our call this weekend God bless