[LAST CALL] Lend ATOM on Mars v2 on Neutron

Change log

  • 2024-07-19 Created initial post
  • 2024-08-06 Added Signers of Grant commitee and executable message & additional information about the use of Hydro

Summary

Lend 200,000 ATOM from the Cosmos Hub community pool on Mars Protocol on Neutron via the AADAO / Hydro committees to create a flywheel for DeFi in the AEZ by lowering borrow rates, attracting users and increasing volumes; whilst generating low-risk yield for the Cosmos Hub without Impermanent Loss.

The liquidity export from this proposal will be migrated to Hydro once it is deployed on mainnet (see the section below for more details).

Problem Statement

  • High staking rewards incentivize ATOM holders to stake rather than lend ATOM to credit protocols such as Mars or Umee, leading to shallow supply.

  • Shallow ATOM supply to borrow leads to high and volatile borrowing rate which prevent passive DeFi products such as leveraged staking vaults from being effective at reasonable scale.

  • This translates into lower volume through the Cosmos Hub stATOM and stkATOM POL initiatives, which could otherwise be optimized.

Objectives

  • Attract borrower demand to the AEZ by lowering borrowing rates

  • Enable the creation of DeFi vaults and products around ATOM at scale

  • Bolster the adoption of ATOM liquid staking

Background

Ethereum and its L2 ecosystems are widely regarded as the most developed DeFi ecosystems. Part of this success is path dependent: Ethereum underwent DeFi summer before it moved to PoS. As a result, lending became the accepted, “risk free rate” for yield on ETH. This contributed to large ETH lending supply accumulating in the ecosystem, which, once liquid launched, contributed to the large scale adoption of leveraged ETH positions such as leveraged staking/farming, and hedging strategies such as delta neutral/hedged LP.

Cosmos Hub, on the other hand, launched as a PoS chain before an ecosystem of products such as Neutron and Stride brough significant DeFi use cases for ATOM. As a result, users considered staking as the “risk free rate” for ATOM, which prevented the accumulation of Lending supply, and contributed to limit the adoption of ATOM based DeFi and liquid staking.

By bootstrapping the supply of lent ATOM itself, the Cosmos Hub community pool can remove this roadblock in a profitable, low risk way, and support the adoption of ATOM based DeFi and LST, which directly contributes to the success of Stride and Neutron’s DeFi ecosystem.

Proposal

Allocate 200,000 ATOM to the AADAO grant multisig on DAODAO, to be lent on Mars Protocol to incentivize increased ATOM borrowing by lowering rates and sponsor the development of DeFi products that borrow ATOM.

Lending is comparatively safer than providing liquidity because it does not require exposure to a secondary asset’s price and does not expose to impermanent loss. Since lending is overcollateralized, the risk of default is close to null as long as the protocol’s design and risk framework is sound.

Lent ATOM would also generate revenue for the Cosmos Hub from the fees paid by third parties borrowing ATOM. These are expected to increase significantly as DeFi products that borrow ATOM (see below) and leverage trading/perps are introduced with Mars V2 in the upcoming weeks.Justification The requested amount of 200,000 ATOM is intended to create an impactful lending pool that can effectively lower borrowing rates. A substantial supply of ATOM is necessary to make borrowing rates attractive and competitive, thus driving user adoption of ATOM and participation in DeFi products.

This amount ensures that there is baseline liquidity to support a variety of DeFi strategies, such as leveraged staking, single-sided LP vaults, leveraged LPing and other more advanced strategies without causing excessive volatility in borrowing costs. The second order effect of this is increased ATOM liquidity and demand in DeFi protocols.

How does lending ATOM lower borrowing rates?

Credit protocols such as Mars and Umee balance supply (assets lent) with demand (assets borrowed) by adjusting the cost of borrowing: the higher the percentage of an asset has been borrowed, the more costly loans become. Lending additional ATOM increases the supply available for borrowing. As a result, existing loans represent a smaller share of the ATOM lent, and the cost of borrowing is reduced. Lower borrowing rates incentivise protocols and users to borrow more ATOM to participate in DeFi, for example through leveraged staking, perps and other types of products, and therefore contribute to the growth of the AEZ’s DeFi ecosystem.

Example of unlocked products

Leveraged staking vaults

To sponsor the adoption of ATOM Liquid Staking, simple leveraged staking vaults can be developed to enable users to easily lend liquid staked ATOM tokens, borrow ATOM, liquid stake them and repeat the process until the desired leverage factor has been reached. The vault would continuously monitor ATOM and liquid staked token prices to reduce the leverage factor as needed to avoid liquidations.

Because ATOM and its liquid staked tokens are highly correlated in price, this strategy is relatively low risk and can be extremely lucrative for ATOM holders, and generate revenue for Cosmos Hub through the borrowing APR.

For context, such strategies represent a large portion of the DeFi TVL / activity in the Ethereum L1 and L2 ecosystem. Levered LPing Delta-Neutral Hedged Vaults

Automated Delta-Neutral Vaults can be built on top of Mars v2 and Astroport PCL pools with ATOM. By borrowing ATOM and (if not a stable) the paired token it would be possible to hedge out market volatility therefore reducing risk for LPers and potentially increasing Atom Liquidity and Trading Volume with minimal exposure to the counterparty asset’s price.

Single-Sided Hedged LP Vault

Automated Vaults can be built on top of Mars v2 and Perps on Neutron to reduce risk and increase revenue for the Cosmos Hub when deploying capital within the ecosystem.

This approach could enable the Cosmos Hub to provide single-sided liquidity to AMMs across the ecosystem without price exposure to other tokens. This is made possible by a combination of levered LPing and perps hedging on Mars.

Implementation

Upon successful passing of the proposal, the full amount of 200,000 ATOM will be sent from the Cosmos Hub community pool to the AADAO multisig before the transition to the final Hydro multisig once it’s established.

After the transition, in the case of successful bidding on Hydro, Mars Protocol will assume custody and manage the ATOM in alignment with our strategic objectives. If the bidding is not successful, the funds will remain with Hydro.

Signer Address
AtomAgent neutron10jyhmetv56cqlkqae5xg6j9fk4m940tnj0xvpy
lama neutron13ttpwjxmh8464gqm3a7z5kkf2n23y32w03qufd
Falcon neutron189cjyuft7m3rv52q63m3vqm8wr4plh69t5rh8n
aadaocosmonaut neutron1fstnrx7h63gq2aj2tc3mugqymlq5fuk27frfy2
LeftLedgerAtHome neutron1mwmxklgemulec7d8nhhs629e3lcryue9m5frs2
AtomicJoe neutron1xa6vdy5lzkwv685j3rvyuegwtq0z57lgt79du9
7_sig neutron1y4g78sp8xtt55u9axq7fe2wn48p6k0cxsmc7yl
  {
    "bank": {
      "send": {
        "to_address": "cosmos1syhp2rh3kgqpa5hjrkyfsqsh49mqyye5k9ejc70lev9pq5g9spxs7ya6zd",
        "amount": [
          {
            "denom": "uatom",
            "amount": "200000000000"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
]

Proposed Flow:

  • Discussion period of 1 week on Cosmos Hub forum

  • On chain proposal and voting period

  • If approved, the 200,000 ATOM will be sent from the Cosmos Hub community pool to a multisig DAO controlled by AADAO (neutron10xwzc88kefwtlup9c2tmw4mj4ng7u79g8lsapp0c9jc02xt247zqwzzghf).

  • AADAO lend ATOM on Mars V2 at launch up to 90% of the deposit cap and top up the position when deposit caps are raised.

Transition to Hydro

Hydro is an auction platform designed for the efficient deployment of liquidity across the ecosystem. Developed by the Informal team, Hydro is currently processing the community feedback provided on their forum proposal. The first auctions is expected to take place within the next couple of months.

The following transition will occur once Hydro launches on mainnet:

  • The 200k ATOM will be transferred by the AADAO multisig to the Hydro committee multisig

  • The ATOM will count towards the ATOM bucket of the Hydro protocol, enabling Mars and other parties to compete for the allocation through their bids.

  • When the round completes, the Hydro committee will rebalance the position.

    • In the case of a successful bid from Mars Protocol, the corresponding amount of ATOM will be redeployed on the protocol.

    • In the case that Mars Protocol fails to secure the position through its bidding, the ATOM will remain with Hydro and be deployed as per the general auction.

Governance votes

The following items summarize the voting options and what they mean for this proposal:

YES: You wish to transfer 200,000 ATOM tokens from the Community Pool to the dedicated (tbd) AADAO wallet to be loaned on Mars v2 on Neutron.

NO: You do not wish to transfer 200,000 ATOM tokens from the Community Pool to the dedicated multisig (tbd) AADAO wallet to be loaned on Mars v2 on Neutron.

ABSTAIN: You wish to contribute to the quorum but you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.

NO WITH VETO: A ‘NoWithVeto’ vote indicates a proposal either (1) is deemed to be spam, i.e., irrelevant to Cosmos Hub, (2) disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or (3) violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently set out by Cosmos Hub governance. If the number of ‘NoWithVeto’ votes is greater than a third of total votes, the proposal is rejected and the deposits are burned.

3 Likes

Supporting the leading DeFi leverage suite of the AEZ (since it’s on Neutron) sounds like a sensible idea. This would increase DeFi activity on ATOM, boost activity on Mars, generate more fees from Neutron, and provide more rewards to ATOM stakers, all without realistic risk.

3 Likes

Interesting idea. I’m all for most things that can help with deFi use cases in the AEZ.

I think this could be a good use case for Hydro when it launches.

Also, to be thorough, I think it would be wise to include a section on the risks inherent to this.

1 Like

With hydro looming I would normally be dubious about such a deal. However improving the defi activity with the AEZ seems useful and on balance probably not worth the delay.

A couple of questions:

Assuming that this generates some revenue what is the intended use of it?

What are the potential risks?

At what point would Mars be sufficiently bootstrapped that the tokens would be returned to the CP?

3 Likes

Good questions, my take:

  • I agree with being a good use-case for Hydro. However - given the immediate need for this (less than 2 weeks away from the Drop launch) I think this approach is best
  • Risks associated to lending ATOM in Mars are the traditional ones that a Money Market incurs. There are of course smart contract risks (mostly bugs), risk-methodology risks (which could open up economic attacks) and liquidity risks (if utilization is high it might be difficult to withdraw part of it). This are the top ones that come to mind
  • Lending ATOM in the Red Bank can result in substantial revenue. This will accrue in the form of ATOM as Borrow APR. Normally it would just accrue and the ATOM position would increase over time as debt is repaid by borrowers. It can be used in any way Governance here deems it appropriate. Either by keeping it in Mars if there is enough demand or returned if Governance so desires
  • Re Bootstrapping and Returning: This might be difficult to predict at this point, but I think after a few months post Drop launch it would be good to assess current ATOM utilization and decide base on the current state of things
3 Likes

Lower ATOM borrowing rates could really help to kickstart defi in AEZ. Overall, I support this proposal. Please take my comments in the spirit in which they are intended, constructive criticism.

I think it would be interesting to see how much ATOM this 200K position would become after a 12 month period, so I would like to see the interest being applied to the position, rather than being returned to CP each month, or whatever.

I wonder if it might be worth including some parameters of the type: When lent ATOM on Mars Protocol exceeds 2M ATOM, and borrow utilisation is below 50%, then return the 200K ATOM + accrued interest to CP.

IDK if these numbers / percentages make sense. However I think it’s useful to have an idea of when this sort of POL deal is to be closed off.

Other than that, this seems value accretive to the Cosmos Hub CP, and beneficial to Cosmos defi users.

4 Likes

We applaud the Mars team on their inaugural post on the forum, and wish them the best in their discussions with the community here and any subsequent onchain governance vote.

We at the Atom Accelerator DAO (AADAO) have opted to provide custody of the funds through our Grants multisig wallet, since a successful governance vote will not be able to directly send the funds to or interact with the Mars protocol.

At AADAO, we dislike multisigs for these purposes. As such, we have provided funding support to both Timewave v1 and v2 - smart contracts that among other tasks, allow for Protocol Owned Liquidity (PoL) to be deployed without needing a “trusted middleman” multisig.

With Hub governance recently approving a gov-controlled ICA account on Neutron, we are currently in discussions about migrating funds that we are custoding on behalf of the Hub (ATOM/stATOM on Astroport Neutron) to Timewave (now called Valence). This would eliminate the need to have a multisig to exercise the wishes of governance on PoL deals.

Valence, however, is not yet able to interact with the Mars protocol. As such, should this proposal be successful, there will be a need for a multisig to custody these funds, ensuring Hub governance’s will is promptly exercised (e.g., in the case of Hub Gov revoking the deal and wanting to claw back the funds).

Acting as stewards of the Cosmos Hub, AADAO’s role, until Valence is ready to exercise control over assets on Mars, would be to simply execute Hub’s governance decisions.

5 Likes

Great proposal, really well-written, detailed, and definitely looks to be a great idea to bootstrap Neutron DeFi.

Can you go into a little detail about what the current interest rate parameters for ATOM on Neutron are, how little ATOM is currently deposited, and how the current high utilization makes leveraged staking nonviable?

For context, how much ATOM is deposited for lending on the Osmosis outpost of Mars Protocol? This could incentivize borrowers to pay down their loans on Osmosis and open new loans on Neutron if the borrowing rate becomes cheaper on Neutron, right.

Also, have you considered adding a Login with GitHub option to the Mars Protocol discourse forum?

1 Like

Hi, the current Interest Params for ATOM are as per below:

{
“max_loan_to_value”: “0.74”,
“liquidation_threshold”: “0.75”,
“liquidation_bonus”: “0.1”,
“reserve_factor”: “0.1”,
“interest_rate_model”: {
“optimal_utilization_rate”: “0.8”,
“base”: “0”,
“slope_1”: “0.14”,
“slope_2”: “3”
}

Current utilization on Mars v1 / Neutron is low, however we expect the demand for ATOM to increase significantly with the Drop launch and Mars v2 deployment (which will enable several interesting strategies and potentially boost significantly ATOM demand). The goal of this proposal is to anticipate that and have enough ATOM supply to accomodate these strategies and boost ecosystem growth.

While it is true that some ATOM depositors on Osmosis might be searching for the best rates and move liquidity across to Neutron, I think DeFi markets at this point are not hyper efficient so I wouldn’t necessarily expect this

3 Likes

Thanks for your feedback, @dynstatic. We’ve just enabled the GitHub login option on our forum.

1 Like

Based on the responses around Hydro and Valance I would like see a financial performance report on a quarterly basis until the funds are returned to the CP. I think this moves us towards are more accountable position without perpetual delaying this.

2 Likes

Just come here to say I appreciate all efforts Mars is doing right now to reform itself and found a better way. I have also read the roadmap on your forum and the decision seems appropriate (shut down of the chain and complete migration to DAODAO and Neutron.).

Greed and pride would prevent many teams to pursue such changes.

1 Like

At Informal, we’re developing Hydro specifically to provide projects like Mars an easier, faster and more efficient access to the Cosmos Hub community pool funds. One of Hydro’s goals is to eliminate the need for ad hoc governance proposals such as this one.

Hydro is beneficial to projects like Mars in that they no longer have to prepare and socialize a forum prop, make guesses around acceptable amount of liquidity exports, set up a new multi-sig and many other such tedious steps. All that comes with a major risk of the proposal ultimately being rejected.

Hydro is also fair to the Cosmos Hub community in that it ensures a remuneration for the exports through the distribution of tributes (bids) from projects to voters. With the Hydro committee overseeing the exports, everything is tightly monitored, which reduces the risk of losing funds.

Hydro is already deployed on the Neutron testnet and has undergone an audit from Oak security. We’re currently finishing a front-end interface for voters and aiming to launch in the next 4-6 weeks. The Hydro timeline is not far apart from the timeline of this proposal since a governance proposal usually stays 2 weeks on the forum and 2 weeks on-chain.

So while we continue to support ATOM exports across the Interchain, the Informal validator will oppose this proposal and call for others to do the same.

In fact, since we want to start a more cohesive and strategic approach to liquidity management, our goal is to re-route (over time) all existing ATOM exports (Osmosis, Agoric, Persistence, Stride & Neutron). In order to minimally affect these projects, this will likely be done in the following way:

  • Position is transferred from the ad-hoc multi-sig to the Hydro committee
  • The project participates in the auction process & wins a certain amount of votes
  • When the previous round completes, the Hydro committee unwinds & rebalances

Based on the amount of support received, the position is made smaller, or potentially bigger.

The Informal team is very committed to onboarding and supporting projects like Mars in using & loving Hydro and making the ATOM token as widely available as possible

4 Likes

With the Hydro launch expected in 4-6 weeks, Informal Systems validator will be voting NO on this proposal. These community pool spend proposals do not make immediate sense when projects can utilize the fair, secure, and simplified way to access these funds that will soon be available.

1 Like

On behalf of the PRO Delegators’ validator team, we will vote NO to this proposal, not due to any reservations about the proposal’s potential benefits to the ecosystem, but rather because the impending deployment of Hydro aligns with the objectives of this request. We must oppose any similar liquidity requests outside of this scope. We encourage the renewal of your proposition upon Hydro’s platform release.
pro-delegators-sign

1 Like

Thank you for your feedback and for sharing the perspective of the PRO Delegators’ validator team. We appreciate your support for the overall objectives of enhancing the ecosystem.

The updated proposal (see changelog) was created in alignment with Hydro.

Regarding the timing and alignment with Hydro’s deployment, we believe that initiating this process now is crucial for several reasons:

  • By lending 200,000 ATOM through Mars Protocol now, we can immediately start lowering borrowing rates and attracting users, which will generate early momentum and liquidity for the AEZ. This proactive approach ensures we don’t miss out on valuable DeFi opportunities in the interim period before Hydro’s launch.

  • Upon Hydro’s mainnet deployment, the proposal outlines a clear transition plan. The 200,000 ATOM will be transferred by the AADAO multisig to the Hydro committee multisig. This ensures that the liquidity can seamlessly integrate into Hydro’s platform, maintaining alignment with its objectives while leveraging the early benefits from Mars Protocol.

  • The proposal ensures that the community retains control over the funds through a multisig DAO, with a structured process for transition and reallocation based on Hydro’s future auctions. This flexibility allows us to adapt to the evolving ecosystem without losing initial momentum.

Thank you for your consideration.

1 Like

I didn’t see anywhere in the proposal the terms of the loan, interest rate, etc.

Thank you for you considering the feedback. Our primary concern was the lack of clarity regarding the transition to Hydro. Your recent proposal update has addressed this particular point. There was also a second aspect that we considered to lean toward changing our vote, we noted Hydro has switched plans to support to all LSM share, which the Informal team said it would extend the delivery by a few weeks.

This extended time horizon combined with the immediate launch of DROP, could indeed support demand for immediate liquidity. This further support the argument to deploy now while ensuring a smooth migration when Hydro finally lands.
In light of those two elements we clearly had no reasons to oppose the proposal anymore. Therefore we will immediately update our vote.

Thank you for providing clarity.
Govmos.

1 Like