[PASSED] Development Approval Request for the ATOM Alignment Treasury

Hub Proposals Signaling/Text
21

Proposal is on-chain! Mintscan

4 Likes
22

go ahead!
I think you should do it

23

any update about AAT ?

24

A lot of the functionality that sits within the AAT overlaps with what is currently being discussed around ATOM wars. We are waiting for clarity around the scope of that to better understand what the Hub’s needs might be here. Most likely ATOM wars is more about shorter term alignment v.s. AAT’s longer term alignment, but we have to wait for the following:

  • What is the suggested scope of ATOM wars?
  • What type of protocols are targeted?
  • Is the community in favor of it?
  • If the above is clear, what place does the AAT have in this context, and is it worth adding significant logic complexity to the Hub?

Until we have clarity around it I think it would be a waste of resources to go ahead with building the AAT at this point. I hope everyone can understand that sentiment, but I’m happy to hear folk’s thoughts on this!

2 Likes