Stop Asking for money, just accept the Grant that was provided.
It is meant for alignment, you and every other validator shouldn’t be price aware, only ownership aware.
1 Like
What kind of answer is this? The only one asking for money here is Neutron, with all validators subsidizing the costs to run neutron since the beginning. And it wasn’t a ‘grant’ but rather a lowering of the subsidizing costs for validators for a specific time period which of course needs to be renewed as originally discussed.
It wasn’t meant for ‘alignment’ but to help with consumer chain costs, since this idea of using NTRN from the airdrop given to the Cosmos hub was originally suggested by us. Moreover, you are just another validator, you have 0 authority so why you talk in that tone? I just tagged you because somehow you were part of the multisig, but those NTRN are in the Cosmos Hub so decisions are made by the Cosmos Hub governance, not you. So instead of talking in such a tone, ask Spaydh to check the Cosmos hub forum, since last June I think it is time to check the forum and this thread
You sure?
I created this idea and shopped it with Spaydh, alignment was always the only real goal.
this proposal is not meant to make validators profitable into perpetuity, its an alignment grant for all participating stakeholders. If you want to be better paid to run the Neutron Consumer chain then make a proposal to spend some of the many ATOM or NTRN held by the community pool and see what the community thinks.
No one is entitled to a lengthening to the above vesting grants and Spaydh or myself or Hypha are not to be comandeered around to come and answer to your many demands.
Start a normal governance process if you are looking for renewed funding outside of the scope of this proposal please.
Sincerely,
Ertemann
Lavender.Five Nodes
4 Likes