PROPOSAL #90 [REJECTED] Community Health research, analytics and benchmarking

Actually, I don’t see much of a reason why building an on-chain community health tool would make sense. For example, in my analysis on Proposal 82, I found that there were over 36,000 telegram messages sent about the proposal, much of the discussion took place on twitter, and on the forum.

That’s all to say, most of our governance activity takes place off-chain. Additionally, what is currently a $30,000 spend for a pilot of a community health framework would become much more expensive if built on-chain, and work has already begun on the project.

If the pilot goes well, perhaps we would like to see the workstream continue, or eventually move to on-chain solutions, but imo it is totally unnecessary for a pilot.

Community exists and interacts regardless of market conditions. Perhaps with a methodical approach to improving community health, when more people start joining the community in a bull market, we will be more equipped to on-board them into a healthy and vibrant community.

1 Like