Chiming in here to clarify that 994 has no impact on the technical relationship between neutron-1 and cosmoshub-4 - it is a clerical change on the Hub’s side to ensure that validator queries list consumer chains and has to validate and show only chains that are actually available or required, respectively.
1 Like
We suggest directing the dATOM funds to Hydro, which is well equipped to manage the necessary allocation processes efficiently. Integrating these assets into the general liquidity auction mechanism appears to be a far more effective and purposeful approach than transferring them to the Community Pool, where they currently lack a clearly defined use case.
Thank you, @lexa for providing this clarification. I appreciate your time, anyone’s time, engaging, regardless of differing opinions.
In short, this means Neutron still has the ability to return the commited ATOM, correct? Does sending liquid stake, via Drop, not enable Neutron to retain its voting?
It seems Neutron reset a standard RE Cosmos Hub’s on-chain governance. Conveniently after reaching its new chapter. Does this not tell the broader Hub community that what is stated through on-chain proposals does not really mean anything?
Hey there, just to clarify, I’m on the Oversight Committee for AADAO specifically, not for the Hub more broadly (though the Hub could probably use one).
Let me catch up on what’s happening, and I’ll follow up with any suggestions, if any.
1 Like
Any update about this? You mentioned one week and it has been over a month already
1 Like