Signaling proposal to allow Hub governance to execute clawbacks with ease

[Syed]

Thanks for your thoughts on this @FHZ. I wanted to address an aspect of your post - about proposal 101.

@FHZ

If this statement is true, is there a deliberate effort from AADAO’s core team, and a linked Cosmos Hub Top 20 Validator, conceived through the grants program, in avoiding responding to the Aid Proposal for Earthquake Survivors in Türkiye thread?

NO, AADAO is not using the grants program to avoid responding to your questions about the Earthquake proposal. I don’t even really know what it means.

The Earthquake proposal, like many other “Community Spend Proposals” are in no way linked to AADAO; nor does AADAO have any power, influence or control over the people behind those proposals; nor is AADAO in any way responsible for the deliverables listed in these non-associated proposals.

I can see you have already brought this issue up in the thread below, and Grace (member of our Oversight) has already responded to you:

Aid Proposal for Earthquake Survivors in Türkiye

Hi there, Dilan left AADAO earlier this year, March 2024. Mikey’s contribution ended with the pilot year. Current and former AADAO contributors lists available here: Can you clarify for me what AADAO/Mikey/Reena have to do w Prop 101? P.S.: I’ll try pinging Dilan for you.

I would recommend not hijacking the current forum thread for the sake of healthy discussion.

For clarity, just reiterating that Atom Accelerator DAO had and has nothing to do with Proposal 101: Aid Proposal for Earthquake Survivors in Türkiye.