Hello everyone! I’m glad to see this forum and see everyone’s discussion on COSMOS. I am a member of the Chinese community, please forgive my poor English, I use google translate, although I still don’t know how to express my inner thoughts, but I still want to say a few words.
Background: The cosmos project was released early, and compared to the current L2 project, it lacks funding. However, through a long period of practice, it has been proved that the advantages of the cosmos network have been reflected. I personally think that cosmos is also L2.
ATOM is similar to ETH
EVMOS+OSMOSIS+Gravity bridge+NFT+…Similar to OP (=zk=Arbitrum=…)
As you can see, cosmos is more like modular, so he is flexible. In the future, if zk is also introduced into cosmos (for example: zkEVMOS), if there is a problem with a certain project, it will not affect others, or the impact will be very small.
However, for so many years, Atom lacks the ability to capture value and lacks an anchor in the cosmos ecosystem. It has the same status as ETH. Although ETH is converted to POS, it still cannot expand rapidly, so there is L2. Therefore, the same cosmos 2.0 is proposed, I am very optimistic about it, thank you for your dedication to cosmos.
From Bitcoin to today, everyone is constantly exploring, and many models are also being explored. I hope that everyone can compare the existing models of other projects in many aspects, how can we take the essence and remove the dross, innovation belongs to us model. Grasp the main contradiction of the problem and grasp the main aspect of the contradiction.
cosmos is different from OP/zk/arb… They have a lot of venture capital institutions and have enough money, but we have enough advanced concepts, and our mechanism allows us to join forces, such as: EVMOS+OSMOSIS+ Gravity bridge+NFT+… Everyone should help each other, and at the same time, bind everyone together through atom.
I will continue to pay attention and learn with you. I will say this first.
2 Likes