DragonStake team still have not a defined vote for this proposal. We are hesitating between an abstain and a veto.
We are in favour of this kind of grants from the community pool. But we a are really disappointing with the procedure and the style of this first proposal.
We think it could be a very bad precedent if we deliver grants like this. Without a propper and serious procedure, without previous public discussion and, in general with a patent lack of information/communication.
We really hope that after this ice breaking first proposal, the quality and the minimun requirements for a serious proposal get some consensus inside the community.
For this purpouse we suggest discussing in a separete thread the conveniece of a template with this minimum contents:
BTW, this thread is not in the right category ( governance )