[Prop#986] [Passed] Funding Hydro development & integrations in 2025

I’m voting no, but I want to say that cost isn’t the reason. Cost here is… Basically just meh. Not something I object to though, and sorry to say but in fact it is less than 0.1% of humans who can use the cosmos software stack.

Hence the compensation.

Neat stretch goal though: 0.1% population as users of the SDK

…I have some concerns about hydro and systemic risk, but if this thing passes that’s okay with me. I won’t be vetoing, don’t think people should veto, and wish everybody good luck!

Also I would love answers to the questions here:

Actually given that no questions have been answered, I formally suggest veto.

4 Likes