We endorse this program and want to provide constructive feedback. This initiative could potentially be overlooked due to its complexity, particularly for typical Cosmos users. We suggest reevaluating the proposal’s structure prior to launching it. Currently, the Cosmos community sentiment is quite low, as we’ve discussed in this post as well as this one.
Our concern is that users might scrutinize every community pool expenditure given the current climate. Thus, we advise extra care in presenting this proposal to on-chain governance. While we believe this proposal is beneficial for the community, we’re concerned that the current format might be too intricate for the average user. Even with our in-depth knowledge of blockchain technology and the Cosmos ecosystem, we found the proposition’s scope challenging to understand. We believe a general Cosmos user might find it even more challenging. We noted a lack of clarity regarding QF mechanisms and community involvement in the process. We recommend adding a dedicated paragraph to explain the process in detail, with practical examples.
This is why we would like to see a revised version of the draft before considering an on-chain proposition. Despite that, we definitely support the program.
We hope this feedback will be considered.
Govmos
