[PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Acquisition of Stargaze

Executive Summary

Stargaze proposes a strategic acquisition by Cosmos Hub, migrating its core apps, NFTs, and users to the Hub. The acquisition entails three key components: a STARS-to-ATOM token migration, operational funding for the Stargaze frontend, and team funding to ensure seamless integration and continued growth.

What Cosmos Hub gets: the #1 NFT marketplace in Cosmos— $50M+ lifetime volume, 20k+ monthly active traders, protocols generating ~$50k/month in revenue, and ~3,000 ATOM in monthly gas fees—plus a shipping-fast team and blue-chip collections such as Bad Kids and Celestine Sloths, revenue share in future growth.

What Stargaze gets: deep ATOM liquidity, Hub-grade security, and full IBC Eureka reach, removing the limitations of a small app chain, and enabling cross-chain mints, trades, and launches from any wallet.

Component ATOM Requested Vesting / Lock-up Purpose
STARS ➜ ATOM Migration 2,750,359 ATOM Locked until claimed Redeem all circulating STARS [1] at the 200-day moving average price + customer acquisition cost (CAC), with a clawback of unclaimed funds to STARS stakers. ATOM price = $5.20 (on 5/22/2025). STARS price = $0.00408 (200-day moving average on 5/22/2025). CAC = $3 million.
Stargaze Frontend Licence 48,077 ATOM 25% liquid, 75% 12-month lock Keeps stargaze.zone frontend + infra live on the Hub for 12 months ($250k / yr).
Stargaze Team Funding 276,923 ATOM Stargaze-Hub Oversight DAO One year transitional fund for the core team ($120k / mo) to ship the roadmap, run the marketplace, and support launches over the next year. Distributed quarterly from the DAO.

This proposal will accelerate Hub user acquisition and transform it into a true economic hub that’s not only useful, but fun (and bad!).

Key Metrics

Category Metric Value Context / Period
Platform Performance Lifetime marketplace volume >$50 million Oct 2021 – Apr 2025 cumulative GMV
Secondary-market volume (Q1 2025) $7.14 million Jan – Apr 2025
Creator revenue paid $14 million Cumulative since launch
Average monthly protocol revenue ~$50k Apr 2024 – Apr 2025 mean
User Base Monthly active traders 20,000+ Organic users, web + mobile
30-day user retention 40% Industry benchmark: >25% is “excellent”
Competitive Standing Marketplace revenue rank #4 globally Past 30-day window; ahead of Blur & Rarible
Value to Cosmos Hub Estimated gas fees to Hub ~3,000 ATOM / month At current trading volume

Context and Motivation

Background of Stargaze

Launched in October 2021, Stargaze established itself as the canonical NFT marketplace within the Cosmos ecosystem, hosting blue-chip collections like Bad Kids, Mad Scientists, Celestine Sloths, and OMies. Lifetime volume surpasses $50 million, with recent growth reaching $27.84 million in 2024 and $7.14 million in Q1 2025 alone. Furthermore, the top collections on Stargaze have a combined market cap greater than $15 million.

Why the Hub?

As a low market cap app-chain, Stargaze is liquidity constrained. Joining the Hub unlocks more liquidity – ATOM is CEX-listed everywhere. With IBC Eureka and ICS-721 routing, you’ll be able to buy an NFT from any chain, and any wallet. Stargaze will join Stride and others, for the first time, in building directly on Cosmos Hub. The Hub will benefit from adding a proven platform for incubating projects and artists, for user onboarding, and community growth.

STARS Tokenomics Background

STARS launched in 2021 via an LBP (liquidity bootstrapping) event on Osmosis with a loan of OSMO from the Osmosis Community Pool. This was basically a reverse Dutch auction, enabling price discovery. It was the first time in blockchain history where a chain was bootstrapped from another chain. STARS launch included an airdrop of 25% of the supply to ATOM stakers and OSMO LP participants.

STARS was designed with similar tokenomics to Bitcoin, where new issuance decays over time. So while STARS started off with high inflation its first year, it significantly got reduced to its current value of 4.3%, one of the lowest inflation rates in the Cosmos ecosystem.

For the first 3 years of operations, all fees collected from Launchpad and Marketplace trading went to STARS stakers. The Stargaze team didn’t start earning any revenue until mid-2024. STARS was the first Cosmos token with real yield, yield earned from protocol operations instead of inflation. STARS was also the first Cosmos token with a burn mechanic. In the first few years of operation, 50% of fees went to stakers, and 50% was burned.

Cosmos Public Goods Funding

Alongside bootstrapping the NFT ecosystem in Cosmos, STARS funded the development of several public goods such as ICS721, DAO DAO, and AtlasDAO. Stargaze developers also have many contributions to Cosmos ecosystem projects like Cosmos SDK and CosmWasm.

Protocol Usage and Metrics

Marketplace

Stargaze apps launched during the marketwide “NFT Winter” that began in early 2022 and is recently warming. Despite difficult macro conditions, projects have launched and thrived on Stargaze, contributing to steady growth in NFT TVL and Marketplace volume.

As digital platforms use GMV (Gross Merchandise Volume) as the key metric for evaluation, Marketplace volume provides the best yardstick for platform performance. It is a gauge for platform revenue through trading fees, ongoing creator revenue through royalties, total economic throughput from traders, alongside a proxy for user growth and culture.

Secondary marketplace trading is the primary source of revenue for the protocol due to a 2% fee on each trade made.

Broken down by year, Stargaze Marketplace has demonstrated strong growth and survived a brutal bear market. It has achieved 74.4% annualized growth from launch that has gradually accelerated, demonstrating 144% annualized growth from Q1 2023 to Q1 2025.

2022: The first year of Marketplace saw a total trading volume of $3.91 million, during a difficult bear market and the start of the NFT winter.

2023: Volume rose to $5.25 million, showing steady growth of ~34% year-over-year despite ongoing market headwinds and low global NFT sentiment.

2024: A breakout year with $27.84 million in volume — a more than 5x increase from 2023. This surge marked Stargaze Marketplace’s emergence as a leading marketplace with strong product-market fit and adoption.

2025 (Jan–Apr only): In just four months, Marketplace has already recorded $7.14 million, outpacing the entire volume of 2023 and on track to exceed 2024 if momentum continues.

Furthermore, Stargaze Marketplace has seen growth despite morass in the global NFT market. As a normalized percentage, growth on Marketplace has outpaced estimates on the global NFT market by 500%.


The continued growth of Stargaze Marketplace volume in the face of challenges is a strong testament to the product, team, and community. It is the top choice in Cosmos for independent creators, for protocols launching an NFT project for their community, and as a destination for projects looking to migrate from other chains.

We anticipate Marketplace volume to continue to grow across 2025 and into 2026. With deployment on the Hub, we expect this growth can be amplified to attain long term platform sustainability. With sustainability, there’s potential for ATOM stakers to share in Stargaze’s growth via distribution of trading fees.

In comparison to top marketplaces, Stargaze Marketplace ranks #4 in revenue based on data from the past 30 days. Note that Stargaze usage and growth is completely organic. Stargaze does not have a points program like many of the other marketplaces in this list and does not have incentives for trading. It also has protection against wash trading, and has little to no NFT farming in hopes of a token launch (like OpenSea).

Rank Marketplace Revenue ($) Share (%)
1 Magic Eden $743,000 69.7%
2 OpenSea $260,000 24.4%
3 Tensor $25,000 2.3%
4 Stargaze $20,000 1.9%
5 Blur $12,000 1.1%
6 Rarible $6,100 0.6%

Source: nftpulse.org (30-day)

Launchpad

Mint revenue is distributed to creators at launch with the platform taking a 5% to 8% fee. Stargaze Launchpad fees are on the lower end across major NFT launchpads at present.

Market-wide, mint revenue has trended downward relative to Marketplace volume as most projects opt for a strategy of lower mint prices and a focus on the secondary market. This trend has been reflected on Stargaze since launch at the very start of the NFT Winter.

2022: $7.97 million in mint volume, driven primarily by the genesis launch event when dozens of projects launched for the first time and NFTs first came to trade in Cosmos.

2023: $1.67 million in mint volume reflecting the above market trends toward small launches.

2024: $3.03 million in mint volume, showing growth but maintaining a trend toward less expensive mints.

2025: $270,000 in mint volume to date.

The inverse relationship between mint volume and Marketplace growth reflects the maturity of the NFT platform and community. NFT collections are becoming more popular as low price or free mints to reward existing communities, such as with Elys, MANTRA, Union, and Lava Network. Other top trading projects like Architects and Mad Scientists minted elsewhere and moved to Stargaze. The community has more discerning buyers and there are far fewer rug-pulls. As Marketplace volume represents stickier activity than mint volume, this inverse relationship is a positive indicator of platform health.

We anticipate mint volume will continue to reflect a preference for inexpensive mints and more secondary volume. Nonetheless, the platform has several key mints scheduled for the remainder of 2025 and a Hub deployment would provide the opportunity for a Hub Genesis Mint.

Names

Stargaze Names is a popular ENS-like name service, with close to 25,000 names minted. Names is integrated into the Stargaze platform for creator verification, linking social media, and other key functions. A migration to Cosmos Hub can include a deployment of Stargaze Names, updated to service Cosmos Hub addresses.

Names can be another revenue-generating app for the Hub. Names uses a market-based renewal mechanic, with a fee split between stakers and the Community Pool. This could be deployed on the Hub with revenue split between the Stargaze team and the Hub Community Pool or ATOM stakers.

Furthermore, Names can be renamed to Cosmos Name Service (or ATOM name service), and be expanded to service all app chains over IBC. It can be a shared, human-readable identity layer that:

  • drives recurring fee revenue to ATOM stakers,
  • removes a big UX hurdle for every app-chain, and
  • reinforces the Cosmos Hub’s role as the service-provider nucleus of the Interchain.

Infinity Pools

Similar to Sudoswap, the Stargaze Infinity Pools allows users to create pools between NFTs and fungible tokens and earn swap revenue. Due to NFT market maturity and overall liquidity in the Cosmos, this and other NFTFi tooling are not a focal point at present but can be deployed at a later date.

App Usage and Metrics

Stargaze’s main frontend has been live since March 2022 when the 12 genesis collections launched. The website has facilitated over 20,000 monthly active users (MAUs), and has a 30-day user retention rate of 40%.

For reference, a retention rate of 25% is considered excellent for web apps. Only the top 10% of consumer apps have a retention rate of greater than 30%. This shows that Stargaze has an incredibly loyal customer base, facilitated by the app/website. This is a solid base that can continue to grow if Stargaze is given the opportunity to continue iterating and building.

The website also has shown MAU growth, with as much as 35,000 in a single month. These are addresses that have performed an NFT action like minting and trading, and excludes non-NFT actions like staking.


When compared to market cap, Stargaze user metrics are even more impressive. Stargaze’s MAU per $1 million token market cap is more than 10x Osmosis’ MAU per $1 million token market cap.

Another useful comparison is with Magic Eden, a competing NFT platform. Magic Eden’s token, ME, has a valuation of $140 million, around 50x the market cap of STARS. However, many NFT traders claim that Stargaze is a better product. We have a proven track record of cost-efficient user acquisition and retention resulting in one the most passionate communities in crypto – see Testimonials in the Appendix.

Customer Acquisition Cost

Stargaze has almost 20,000 monthly active NFT traders, completely organically. Zero incentives, no paid ads – just real users who genuinely like what we’ve created.

Our competitors (Blur, Magic Eden) spend thousands of dollars per user through airdrops. Blur spent about $2,700 per user, and Magic Eden spent even more, around $5,000 per user. Those users were often farmers chasing incentives, while Stargaze users weren’t.

Stargaze users are real NFT enthusiasts:

  • About 40% monthly retention – they keep coming back.
  • Each wallet is worth, on average, $334.79 each (active wallets for the last 6 months, NFTs only).
  • Each user has spent $25.17 in Marketplace fees on average (last 6 months).

Therefore, Stargaze users are economically active, genuinely committed, and socially engaged. Given the above metrics, we can easily justify valuing each user around $100 - $150 each, much cheaper than what our competitors have already spent.

With around 20,000 monthly active users, that means Stargaze’s user base is worth roughly $2 million - $3 million. So the Hub would be getting an active, passionate NFT community at a huge discount compared to the industry average.

Bad Kids and NFT Assets

A passionate user base and top tier user experience have allowed NFTs to thrive on Stargaze.

The top collections on Stargaze have a combined market cap of ~$15 million. The Cosmos Hub would be acquiring some of the most builder-centric and influential communities in crypto, outside of just Cosmos. For example, Hasu of Lido has a Bad Kid, as does Jon Charbonneau of DBA, Mippo of Blockworks, and Richard Chen of Varrock VC.

Collection Market Cap (USD) Floor Price 24h Volume
Bad Kids $9,324,168.00 $932.79 $2,303.41
Celestine Sloth Society $2,750,274.00 $1,100.55 $916.65
Onchain OMies $483,661.00 $54.23 $552.10
Mad Scientists $393,684 $186.12 $1,104.31
Wandering Whale Sharks $1,271,700 $510.25 $1,911.63
After The Filter $414,007.00 $41.41 $773.29
Bit Kids $255,677.00 $25.58 $104.93
Pixel Wizards $113,278.00 $51.10 $142.91
$15,006,449.00

Stargaze Marketplace is one of the few NFT marketplaces that allows denominating collections in assets besides the main asset of the chain. For example, Bad Kids is already denominated in ATOM, and Celestine Sloth Society and Wandering Whale Sharks are denominated in TIA. There are several high-profile Sloths holders as well, such as Nick White of Celestia. Integration with more denominations and associated high profile collection launches are already scheduled in 2025.

Following a deal, the Hub would become the cultural hub for these diverse communities and associated protocols.

Comparable Token Valuations

Marketplace / Infra Chain Token FDV M-cap Notes
Magic Eden Solana ME $940M $140M Largest NFT platform
Blur Ethereum BLUR $312M $244M Pro-trader aggregator
Metaplex Solana MPLX $186M $141M Creator tooling
Tensor Solana TNSR $150M $57M NFT marketplace
Stargaze Stargaze L1 STARS $3.3M $3M NFT chain + marketplace

In comparison to the competition, a 2,688,260 ATOM (~$13.98M) valuation is relatively small:

  • 1.5% of Magic Eden’s token FDV
  • 4.5% of Blur’s FDV
  • 9% of Tensor’s FDV
  • <1% of Magic Eden’s last valuation ($1.6B series B in June 2022)

If this proposal passes, the Hub would acquire the suite of Stargaze products, including Launchpad, Marketplace, and Studio (similar to Metaplex), all at barely 10% of Metaplex’s token value.

Therefore, this leaves ample upside for ATOM holders if Stargaze captures even modest NFT market share. For ATOM stakers, it is the equivalent to buying the Cosmos NFT crown jewel for roughly only seven weeks of Hub inflation.

Deal Terms

STARS -> ATOM Migration

The metrics above demonstrate that the value of Stargaze should take into account performance, volume, brand and user base. Stargaze serves as the NFT Hub for numerous protocols.

We propose using the 200-day moving average price of STARS for the migration because it is the fairest, least arbitrary compromise between spot-price risk and historic relevance, and backed by decades of precedent in finance, especially in mergers and acquisitions.

A contract will be deployed on the Hub that burns STARS for ATOM. If the proposal passes, then 1000 STARS would convert to 0.7846 ATOM.

After the launch of the EVM version of Marketplace (see Hub Roadmap), any remaining funds will be clawed-back to a snapshot of STARS stakers, in proportion to their staked amount on May 15, 2025. Furthermore, the conversion price will start decaying to 0 linearly after 1 month, to encourage a speedy migration.

Delegations will be snapshotted and the ATOM equivalent value will be allowed to be claimed on the Hub. In order to prevent double claiming, unbonding after the snapshot will be disabled (pending Stargaze governance).

Note that the above is conditional on a separate proposal passing on Stargaze that sunsets the STARS token, and converts Stargaze L1 to a proof-of-authority chain that does not depend on the security of STARS. Stargaze L1 will continue to operate for at least one year until everything is fully migrated, including non-STARS assets.

Component ATOM Requested Vesting / Lock-up Purpose
STARS ➜ ATOM Migration 2,750,359 ATOM Locked until claimed Redeem all circulating STARS at the 200-day moving average price + customer acquisition cost (CAC), with a clawback of unclaimed funds to STARS stakers. ATOM price = $5.20 (on 5/22/2025). STARS price = $0.00408 (200-day moving average on 5/22/2025). CAC = $3 million.

Stargaze Frontend Operational Cost

Software licenses are commonplace across crypto and Cosmos for wallets, oracle services, block explorers, and other infrastructure. This proposal offers the use of the Stargaze frontend app that powers stargaze.zone for a yearly fee of $250k to Public Awesome, the entity that develops and maintains the code. This is in line with peer apps in the ecosystem and industry standards. After one year, this fee can be paid from Stargaze operational profit and should not require more Hub funding requests.

The frontend license guarantees that all operational and infrastructure costs, such as running dedicated RPCs, IPFS hosting, indexers, and backend APIs that support the site.

Stargaze Frontend Licence 48,077 ATOM 25% liquid, 75% 12-month locked and staked Keeps stargaze.zone frontend + infra live on the Hub for 12 months ($250k / yr)

The Stargaze Frontend app is built with modern web technologies such as Next.js, Typescript, and GraphQL. It includes powerful micro-services and APIs for blockchain indexing, IPFS hosting, image processing, rarity calculations, currency tracking, analytics, and more. Much of the backend is built in Rust and Go. This is the secret sauce that makes stargaze.zone so fast and powerful. It took over 4 years to develop, and is non-trivial to build. Many teams in Cosmos have tried to build apps like stargaze.zone but have come up short.

The Stargaze frontend app was also the first NFT platform to be fully functional on mobile. It continues, to this day, to be one of the only mobile-friendly NFT platforms.

Stargaze Studio

Included in this license is Stargaze Studio — a suite of no-code creator tools to launch collections, create whitelists, set royalties, perform airdrops, and more. Studio gives creators full control over their collections from launch to post-mint management.

Stargaze Team

The Stargaze team includes seasoned blockchain engineers with backgrounds in web2, mobile, Ethereum, and Cosmos. The team has always operated very lean and efficiently, and can continue to thrive on the Hub with a small team of 6-8 people. Half the team are technical while half are non-technical. Operating an NFT platform includes a lot of human capital, such as providing support to creators and traders, helping with NFT launches, marketing, growth, social media, and technical support. The team has kept the Stargaze L1 blockchain operational for 4 years without any halts or downtime besides for standard upgrades.

To date, the Stargaze team has managed both the core apps, NFT project support, and all tasks associated with a chain. Deploying purely as apps on the Hub will allow the team to focus entirely on product development and facilitating NFT project success, and as such we anticipate we can achieve strong growth and sustainability after one year.

However, migration to the Hub will be an extremely intensive exercise. Alongside technical implementation, the team will be stewarding the transition for existing creators, projects and users, while delivering new key NFT launches. To ensure the team can facilitate a smooth and successful transition, $120k for the team per month is enough to fund development for the first year.

Stargaze Team Funding 276,923 ATOM Stargaze-Hub Oversight DAO One year transitional fund for a six-to-eight-person lean team ($120k / mo) to run marketplace, support launches & ship roadmap. Distributed quarterly from the DAO.

Sustainability for the Stargaze team following the first year is dependent on marketplace growth and fees. The team aims for 6 to 8 million marketplace volume by early 2026 and achieve sustainability via onboarding and growth for the Hub.

Funds will be distributed to the Stargaze-Hub Oversight DAO, a new DAO to be formed immediately after the passage of this proposal, made up of 3 members representing Stargaze, 3 representing the Hub, and 1 external rotating auditor. The Oversight DAO will distribute 20% of the funds to the Stargaze team for each quarterly milestone after an initial 20% distribution.

For transparency, public Github project boards will be created and mapped to quarterly deliverables. Furthermore, there will be quarterly video town halls and written progress reports.

Hub Roadmap

Besides deploying existing Stargaze apps on the Hub and migrating assets, we propose building new features only possible with IBC Eureka, such as a next-gen Marketplace that operates as a single logical marketplace across all IBC Eureka chains, with NFTs routed through the Hub.

The Stargaze Team plans on implementing the following roadmap after this proposal passes:

Roadmap: 12-Month Deployment Plan

Months 1–3: Migration & Stargaze Marketplace Deployment

  • Deploy Stargaze Marketplace on Cosmos Hub
    Update all contracts, frontend, backend, and indexing infra to run on the Hub.

  • NFT Ownership Snapshot & Provenance Upload
    Snapshot NFTs on Stargaze L1 and persist provenance data to IPFS (or store directly as inscriptions).

  • STARS ➝ ATOM Migration Contract Live
    Deploy Hub-based contract for token redemption and clawback logic.

  • NFT Airdrop to Hub Wallets
    Complete NFT migration using bech32-compatible addresses.

  • Stargaze L1 Governance Transition
    Convert Stargaze L1 to a proof-of-authority chain via governance vote.

  • (Optional) Stargaze Names Deployment
    Deploy updated ENS-like name service for Cosmos Hub users.


Months 4–7: EVM Contract Migration

  • IBC-native Launchpad Deployment (EVM)
    Rewrite Launchpad contracts in Solidity for Hub’s EVM environment. Mint from anywhere with any token.

  • Cosmos Hub Genesis Collections Launch
    Launch new collections exclusively on the Hub, with whitelists and airdrops for proposal voters. Include at least 3 high visibility mints.

  • IBC-native Marketplace Beta Deployment (EVM)
    Deploy Beta version of the EVM marketplace.


Months 8–10: Ecosystem Growth + IBC NFT Hub Routing

  • EVM ICS-721 (IBC Eureka) Upgrade
    Deploy Eureka-ready ICS-721 for interchain NFT routing via the Hub.

  • IBC-native Marketplace Full Deployment (EVM)
    Fully functional version of Marketplace with IBC Eureka routing. Buy NFTs from anywhere with any asset. List NFTs from anywhere in any token.

  • Targeted Ecosystem Marketing
    Run campaigns to highlight Cosmos-native NFT narratives and collections.


Months 11–12: Retention & Monetization

  • ATOM Staker Loyalty Program Launch
    Launch trading fee discounts, exclusive access, and rewards for ATOM stakers.

  • New Feature Rollouts
    Explore AI-powered listings, dynamic royalties, and collection-owned treasuries.

  • Sustainability Milestone
    Target $6 million in monthly Marketplace volume to reach break-even; initiate ATOM staker revenue share if exceeded.

A next-gen IBC-native NFT Marketplace

IBC Eureka enables functionality not possible before. Imagine a Hub-based marketplace that can trade, lend, swap, and build on NFTs living on Ethereum, Solana, and all other Eureka chains. This is now possible with Hub routing and multi-payload IBC packets.

Marketplace features you can’t build anywhere else (yet):

Feature How it works
Cross-chain offers / intent escrow Buyer on ETH signs I want any Mad Lad ≤ 5 ETH. Order routes to the Hub; funds escrowed in ATOM-denominated stable via Stride DEX. Seller on Solana deposits a matching Mad Lad into Hub escrow and triggers a swap.
Gas-abstracted trades from any IBC Eureka chain Buyer on Solana submits IBC transaction to buy a Bad Kid with SOL. Tx routes to the Hub, SOL swapped to ATOM on Stride DEX. Bad Kid purchased and transferred to Solana via ICS-721.
Chain-agnostic auctions Bids arrive as token-transfer payloads from any chain. Hub order-book sorts by value in ATOM. Winning bid refunds losers automatically over IBC.

A next-gen IBC-native NFT Launchpad

Launchpad, too, can benefit from functionality that IBC Eureka provides:

Feature How it works
Mint from any chain in any asset Users on Ethereum pay for mint in ETH. Mint tx routes to Hub over IBC, ETH is swapped on Stride DEX to minting asset. NFT is minted and transferred to Ethereum over IBC.
Cross-chain aidrops Snapshot IBC destination addresses on Cosmos Hub and airdrop via IBC transactions to all holders across all chains. This leverages the Hub as a single-hop IBC router.
zk-TLS whitelists for Sybil resistance Creator sets a rule for a whitelist that only allows X users to mint. zk-TLS is used to verify the X user via the API, preventing minting bots.

Sustainability and Growth

A key goal of this proposal is to provide sufficient funding for Stargaze to operate sustainably without further injections of capital from the Cosmos Community Pool. The valuations proposed in this document suggest 4 to 5 years of sustainability even with no additional revenue source or capital injection. This sustainable period is calculated as follows:

A: Funds available to the Stargaze team, if a proposal on Stargaze passes to distribute a portion of the Stargaze Community pool to the team for continued development.

  • $2.862 million total (based on the 200-day moving average of STARS)
    • 210 million STARS in Foundation account valued at $890,400
    • 465 million STARS from Stargaze Community Pool valued at $1.9716 million

B: Projected revenues from future Launchpad and Marketplace fees.

  • Baseline $2.7 million ($50,000 per month over a 12 month period)
    • Average Revenue between April 2024 - April 2025 is $49,916.66
    • Revenue expected to decrease short term during redeployment

C: Funding provided for team for year 1

  • $1.44 million ($120,000 * 12)

(A + B + C) / (team cost monthly) / (12 months) =>
(2.862 million + 2.7 million + 1.44 million) / (120,000) / 12 => ~4.9 years

For indefinite fiscal sustainability, one of the following is projected to occur during the sustainability period:

  • Increase in revenue from higher marketplace volume
  • Product innovations that generate new sources of revenue
  • Capital injections by VC’s

With our baseline revenue and implementation of our roadmap centering Stargaze at the heart of cross-chain NFT trading, we project solid marketplace volume growth beyond the sustainable range of $6,000,000 in monthly volume, a modest target which has been achieved in high volume months on Stargaze in the past. We do anticipate volume will be disrupted for the first quarter at minimum during the transition period.

As such, the team expects to achieve complete self sufficiency within 12 months of the acquisition (estimated below in Q3 2025).

With $6,000,000 in marketplace revenue or $120,000 in fees as the threshold for sustainability, the Stargaze team proposes a revenue share program with the Hub above that threshold where 15% of fees are distributed to ATOM stakers that use Stargaze for 5 years.

At current transaction volume, Stargaze would generate an estimated $15,000 in gas fees for Hub stakers. As this correlates with marketplace activity, we project that Stargaze can deliver $36,000 in gas revenue to the Hub within the first year. These projections are made assuming proven volume targets and fixed at the current price of ATOM.

With a focus on growth, Stargaze will become a valuable driver of gas fees for the Cosmos Hub alongside revenue share for ATOM stakers who use Stargaze. Our projections are kept within range of already-achieved Marketplace volume numbers in peak months, which can realistically be achieved again. We are confident, however, that within 2 years we can achieve a more ambitious scenario where Stargaze consistently drives $25,000 or more monthly to ATOM stakers through marketplace revenue share alongside gas.

Here are some strategies we plan on working on to increase NFT volume:

User Re-engagement

  • Implement off-platform notifications (email, Telegram) reminding users about trending mints, price alerts, new listings, and other personalized updates.

Volume-Based Loyalty Program

  • Introduce platform-specific benefits (discounted fees, badges, UI skins, special access, etc.) to reward high-volume traders, incentivizing more frequent and larger transactions.

Gamification

  • Incorporate gamified elements such as leaderboards, badges, or daily streak rewards to encourage frequent engagement.

Onboarding High-Volume Collections

  • Actively recruit and onboard creators or projects likely to generate high transaction volume, increasing overall trading activity.

Improved Social Sharing Integration

  • Enhance social media integration, making it easier and more appealing for users to share their mints and trades publicly, driving organic marketplace traffic.

Referral/Affiliate Program

  • Create a dedicated influencer role or affiliate program where users can earn a small fee by successfully driving minting or trading activity through their shared listings or collections.

Trading Competitions

  • Run periodic trading competitions with rewards for highest trading volume or most transactions completed, promoting user engagement and activity.

Personalized Recommendations

  • Leverage user data to deliver tailored recommendations of collections and NFTs, increasing the likelihood of minting and trading.

Value Accrual to Cosmos Hub and ATOM

Stargaze is already the dominant NFT marketplace in Cosmos.

Immediately following deployment, the Hub would inherit Stargaze’ status as the cultural hub of the Cosmos. At present volume, it would gain 3,000 ATOM in monthly gas use from transactions as a baseline.

Stargaze users engage in a large amount of transactions when minting and trading NFTs. As represented as transactions on the Cosmos Hub with gas fees, ceteris paribus Stargaze would provide a range of 6,000 to 12,000 ATOM in gas fees for the Hub per quarter based on Q12024 to Q12025 volumes.

In the case of a Stargaze deployment on the Cosmos Hub, gas fees are direct value capture for ATOM stakers from a large-scale community and product onboarding.

Following deployment on the Hub, our goal is to place Stargaze at the forefront of ecosystem growth within crypto-native audiences alongside new crypto users. We will continue to gain market share in the NFT space by way of technical innovation via cross-chain NFT transfers alongside working with projects to facilitate high visibility, high activity NFT collections launching on the Hub. We will leverage our community, experience and relationships alongside product innovation to make the Hub a top choice for NFT launches across crypto.

Operating as purely a product team, resources can be more efficiently deployed for product development, project support, and growth. Our goal is sustainability within 1 year at a range of $4 to $8 million of monthly volume.

$100,000+ in monthly revenue is very feasible following a one year transition period. From that point, Stargaze can sustain itself indefinitely on the Hub with a very lean team.

In summary, Stargaze brings value to ATOM from:

  • Gas fees from increased transaction volume
  • Dynamic gas fees from popular mints
  • Marketplace trading fees
  • Launchpad minting fees
  • Names purchases and renewals
  • Increased volume from NFT’s use in marketing and narrative building
  • Real world use-case exposure through RWAs and NFTs for ticketing
  • Increased exposure and trading activity from new collections
  • Fees from increased IBC Eureka usage

NFTs as Cosmos Brand Assets

The assets facilitated by the Stargaze platform have become brand identifiers for the entire Cosmos ecosystem. This includes projects incubated on the platform from the very beginning such as Bad Kids - the iconic Cosmos PFP - alongside projects designed to be the face of specific communities like Sloths for Celestia, Mad Scientists for Osmosis, and OMies for Mantra. As such, Stargaze has consistently provided ecosystem-wide value that is not demonstrated in STARS.

The Stargaze platform and team play a critical role in the success of these projects. This includes artist outreach and onboarding, connecting projects with artists, extensive launch preparation, ongoing advising (often from early iterations), and dedicated support. The entire Cosmos ecosystem has benefited from these ongoing incubator services to date and those benefits will increase following a merger. Stargaze has several major NFT launches booked for the remainder of 2025 that could be scheduled to launch shortly following Hub deployment. In total, Stargaze has paid out $14 million to creators over its lifetime.

The most successful enterprises know that it’s not just about technology or product-market fit. It is great storytelling that captures attention and drives adoption. Merging Stargaze into the Hub would affirm commitment to the Hub’s narratives on revival, product-focus, and attracting top-tier teams. Further, it will open the Hub to the organic storytelling, community growth and brand exposure that NFTs enable.

New NFT Use Cases on Cosmos Hub

On the Hub, Stargaze has the potential to leverage IBC Eureka to enable, for the first time, for NFTs to be bought from any chain from any wallet. NFTs can be transferred across chains over ICS-721, an IBC protocol.

NFTs also have use cases in DeFi and RWAs. For example, Uniswap uses NFTs to represent liquidity positions. NFTs can be a foundation for future RWA products such as real estate, where NFTs representing real estate are fractionalized for trading.

Stargaze was one of the first NFT platforms to have an AI minter (thanks to PS Labs). We intend to integrate AI further to improve the user and creator experience, such as AI-priced listings, adaptive royalties based on trading volume, PFPs with personality, user-owned model weights as NFTs, self-governing collection treasuries, and more.

Migration Plan

Migrating a blockchain is not a trivial matter, but here’s a high-level outline of the plan:

  1. Apply for a Cosmos Hub developer account
  2. Deploy Stargaze Marketplace on Cosmos Hub
  3. Snapshot NFT ownership on Stargaze
  4. Pause NFT minting and trading on Stargaze
  5. Upload NFT provenance to IPFS
  6. Airdrop NFTs to same bech32 addresses on Cosmos Hub
  7. Snapshot balances and delegations on Stargaze
  8. Convert Stargaze L1 to a Proof-of-authority chain
  9. Deploy contract to migrate STARS -> ATOM on Hub
  10. Deploy and migrate Launchpad and do Genesis Mint

Risks & Mitigation

As one of the first chain-to-chain acquisitions, this proposal is not without risk.

Risk Likelihood Mitigation / Control
Migration-tech slippage – contracts or other software fail and delay the first milestone Medium Deploy on testnets Budget for external audits of the claim contracts
ATOM price draw-down (<$4) before milestones are reached. Medium Allocate team funds into stATOM on Stride and dATOM on Drop to earn yield and hedge downside.
Security regression – Hub’s larger attack surface (Marketplace, Launchpad, Name Service) invites contract exploits. Low Mandatory external audits + ongoing bounties. Testnet deployment: all new contracts enabled with admin backstops.
Team execution fatigue – 7-8 people may struggle with L1 sunset and EVM rewrite while supporting creators. Medium Set aside contingency budget (10% of team line-item) for short-term contractor sprints.
Stargaze governance dependency – Stargaze governance may not pass proposals required for the migration, such as disabling unbonding after the snapshot. Low Post and discuss parts of this proposal that are conditional on Stargaze governance in the Stargaze forum.

With phased funding, milestone-gated tranche releases, and dedicated audit budgets, the acquisition’s primary risks are manageable and transparent. Governance can monitor each milestone and pause subsequent unlocks if red flags emerge.

Appendix

[1] Circulating supply includes the Stargaze Community Pool. The Stargaze team aims to propose distributing a portion of the Community Pool to the team for continued development. Much of this ATOM will be converted to stATOM and dATOM to preserve staking rewards.

Testimonials

Sincerely hope Stargaze gets a good deal. Team deserves one for grinding all these time, and token holders deserve one for holding all the way.

A rare project today that actually built a community and culture, didn't max extract, but hasn't been rewarded price-wise. https://t.co/au8ZJaDsvq

— Larry Engineer 🍡 (@larry0x) May 2, 2025

Stargaze and its NFT communities bring me lots of joy,

hope they can continue operating.

Stargaze did a lot of things great:
- UI/UX
- Onboarding NFT degens and creators crosschain
- Real users, real volume.

Having Stargaze on any network is a huge benefit. https://t.co/YrDMQvggbX

— Zerk (@Rekt_Zerker) May 1, 2025

Honestly, massive props to @StargazeZone for the smooth, hassle free, 0 gas experience.

► Mempool filter improvements allowed to consistent block production with mint transactions
► Phase 2 minted out in 37 seconds
► 3k req/s phase 1, 5k req/s phase 2

These upcoming… pic.twitter.com/A0OhMv4K2k

— Emir Beriker 0______0 (@e_beriker) February 14, 2025

Happy anniversary! The team at Stargaze is amazing, and supported me throughout my crazy and unexpected pivot to full time professional illustrator. Congratulations all on building a great platform for creativity. https://t.co/a7kzOTcZsb

— sk (@sadsadstory1984) March 12, 2025

I have said it a few times now 😂

But @StargazeZone has some of the most die hard community of all time

Fight me in the comments if you don't think so 😂 joking 😉 we are friendly over here 😆 #StargazeZone 🌟

— nftdreamer 💧🪽 (@nftdreamerstar) March 17, 2025

Stargaze is a great example of the kind of application we want to support on the Cosmos Hub:

1. Serves app chains: Stargaze has PFP collections that define many different blockchain communities. We want to continue serving and supporting these and more

2. Needs excellent… https://t.co/AZIyB4u6Ne

— barry (🥧,📈) (@BPIV400) May 1, 2025
15 Likes

Stargaze has been my home since the wonderful days of launching Pixel Wizards. It’s not just a platform.. it’s a place where I found joy, creativity, and connection. The vibrant, passionate community across so many collections made it irresistible to keep minting, trading, and having fun. Without Stargaze, I genuinely wouldn’t be where I am today.

As someone lucky enough to also be part of the Stargaze team, I want to speak from the heart about what this merger truly means. The Cosmos isn’t just acquiring a protocol.. it’s welcoming a family. With this merger, you’re gaining:

  • A die-hard, deeply loyal community of minters, traders, creators, builders, and JPEG dreamers. People who don’t just talk about using the blockchain—they live it. They create value, spark joy, and keep showing up because Stargaze is their home.
  • A world-class team that doesn’t just dream big but actually delivers. We’ve shipped one of the best NFT products in the space, with love, grit, and attention to every detail.
  • A product that’s not just technically sound—it’s loved. Used daily. Embedded in culture.
  • And the cherry on top: BAD KIDS ARE COMING HOME!

This isn’t just a merger. It’s a moment. A celebration. A leveling-up of what’s possible when community and technology align. I couldn’t be more proud.

8 Likes

First of all, I would like to thank Shane for this very interesting post. As an Atom holder for several years and a Stargaze user, I am happy to see the two chains/teams trying to join forces for a better future.

I agree with Shane and the various opinions I’ve read that Stargaze would be a plus for the Cosmos Hub. We’ve been hearing for years that the majority of Cosmos is nothing more than a devcel circle jerk, with no dedicated user apps. Stargaze is, in my opinion, one of the only Cosmos app to have attracted and retained a large number of users, and I’m not talking about developers or influencers, but random people, you and me. The platform is rich in features not found elsewhere, and based solely on the user interface, it’s the best.

I therefore positively support this proposal and hope to read interesting conversations between the different users on both sides in order to find a solution that pleases everyone.

My only two uncertainties at this stage:

  • It seems that the number of users per month is a metric that has been taken up and quantified and added to the acquisition cost. Seems logical. However, when I read “20,000 monthly users,” my first feeling is that this number is probably overestimated. Cosmos, like many other ecosystems, suffers from sybil accounts, probably even more so than elsewhere with this tendency to farm airdrops. I personally have two wallets (one ledger wallet and one hot wallet), like most people. Having searched many wallets in Stargaze over the past few years, I’ve noticed a very high number of duplicates. Some people have far more than two wallets, some have 10, 15, 20 wallets ..etc. We’re talking thousands of people who have between two and ten wallets on average. If the number of users is included in the calculation, I think it should be significantly lower. I have seen some wash trading or fake minting from creators creating hundreds of wallets to mint their own collection.. etc a lot of manipulation is going on, which is normal in a permissionless and « anonymous » environment.

  • My second point would be about the elephant in the room, which was not mentioned at all in the proposal, the infinite extraction of value

This chart clearly shows a huge extraction going on since inception. Whether it’s extraction from the team selling for salaries, validators selling their commission to pay infrastructure costs, traders selling their NFT trades’ profits in USDC, users discouraged and losing confidence selling rewards, malicious creators selling all their mint revenue and royalties… If the Hub acquires Stargaze and its users (even though many are already overlapping with Cosmos holders) I assume we will also inherit this constant and massive extraction? It will be less impactful considering the liquidity and capitalization of the Hub, but still, perhaps this extraction should be quantified, evaluated and deducted from the cost. Let say Stars token would be at the same price as today but instead of being 99% down it would be 50% up since launch, then it would give a very different picture of the current dynamics in place.

Thanks for reading
Tagu

4 Likes

There are no 20k+ active users on Stargaze right now, isn’t it? Chain is already looks dead. Also are this Stargage users are new to the Hub? I think no.

U can’t fix UI bugs for months. World-class team can’t do simple steps? :laughing:
Oh sorry you were busy with failed Intergaze so u have no time to polish Stargaze. One more point about dead chain.

2 Likes

There is some minor bugs here and there, but overall I have used the platform seamlessly and without any issue for the past years. I found your comment unconstructive and overly negative for not much. Stargaze is very serviceable imo and I don’t think the point of this post is to create a new account just to dunk on Stargaze’s team.

Maybe to not look bitter and toxic you could make a professional post, listing properly type of bugs and issue you have with the platform.

Also, I agree we also need some clarification in regards of Intergaze. If the team focus on migrating stargaze to the Hub, what about intergaze ? How we know we don’t pay ressources to fund work on another platform not running on the Hub ? What’s the point of consolidation of chains/apps/outposts if we continue to create replicate all over the place?

I have seen many arguments from Stargaze team in favor of Intergaze as a need and solution to bring new users from EVM ecosystem, but this is not a fact but speculations and hopes. Moreover, if the goal is to leverage Hub IBC v2 and Eukera, targeting EVM and SOL users, then is this not the same goal/target than Intergaze ?

5 Likes

dude, you asking for 120k$ mo salary and 250k for infra with 20k month revenue. Don’t you see something wrong here?

8 Likes

Hub’s community pool purchased Stargaze, but I can’t see how Stargaze’s revenue is shared with Hub’s community pool? Stride Dex will even share 20% of its revenue with Hub.

3 Likes

Why does it cost 2.75M ATOM (@5.2=14.3M) to acquire a company with a market cap of 3M$ while its annual revenue is only 0.6M?

It’s losing money. If this is normal market behavior, let the market build a new NFT marketplace on Cosmos to compete, instead of Cosmos needing to acquire everything.

You can choose to proactively migrate to the Hub and retain your own token, or sooner or later, you’ll face competition from an NFT marketplace that will inevitably emerge on the Hub.

We’ve already seen this on other permissionless public chains: when the NFT market becomes profitable, multiple entrepreneurial teams will naturally start their businesses in this space.

10 Likes

In favor of the Stargaze acquisition & believe it can bring real value to the Cosmos Hub. The team has built something culturally important with real users and strong metrics & I’d love to see it thrive on the Hub.

But the proposed ask of 3.07M ATOM (~$15M) feels excessive especially considering:

  • STARS FDV is ~$3.5M
  • The token is in a clear downtrend
  • A large part of the valuation comes from an arbitrary customer acquisition cost (CAC)
  • 20k active member figure is exaggerated

I propose we need to find a middle ground for this to go through:

  • ~$4.375M for STARS (a good 25% premium for goodwill)
  • 48K ATOM for the frontend license,
  • 276K ATOM for the team,

That brings the total to ~1.19M ATOM, or ~$6M , which is more aligned with current market value, sustainable for the Hub & still generous to the team & holders

I support this strategic merger, but we need to ensure the price reflects reality, not just sentiment or sunk effort .

7 Likes

I’m going to assume this is just a negotiation starting point as there is no way this is a serious request.

8 Likes

Alright, overall I’m in favor Stargaze joining the Hub makes sense culturally and strategically. The structure feels fair, and I appreciate the OP’s transparency in the write-up.

But a couple of things:

  1. Where’s the timeline if this passes?
    Like, what happens Day 1 after “Yes”? Some of us would like to understand how long this migration and ownership transition will really take.
  2. Why 200-day price average?
    I get the logic behind using a longer-term view to smooth out volatility, but why not 365 days? The 200-day MA undervalues STARS IMO — it dipped hard during periods of low liquidity, and recent momentum isn’t fully captured in that window. It’s not a dealbreaker, but I’d love to hear what made you settle on that specific average.

Still, I think the broader picture matters more — and I’d rather have Stargaze inside the Hub than siloed. Just want to see the rough edges discussed before we hit on-chain.

1 Like

Is the funding request high?

Yes.

They are selling themselves to the hub at 4x current valuation + full staff + licensing fees for a year to rewrite the whole thing into EVM to keep a few collections that could probably just migrate to an EVM NFT marketplace fork anyways.

2 collections are 73% of NFT market cap.

Hypothetically, the hub could pay an EVM dev team to fork one of the numerous platforms and then airdrop to those 2 collections to migrate at a fraction of the price.

11 Likes

Got it.
But the birds are chirping, the foundation has already discussed the plan and given them the go-ahead. You as a validator, know a lot of validators will vote yes regardless. It would be interesting to see if it actually goes through or becomes another stride prop.

2 Likes

As a project that began its journey as part of Stargaze’s genesis collection, GATA HUB has grown alongside the chain and witnessed firsthand the hard work, innovation, and resilience of the Stargaze team. While the STARS token hasn’t always reflected the underlying value, we believe it’s crucial to separate price from product.

Stargaze is a truly exceptional NFT application, arguably the best in the entire ecosystem. The app works, it scales, and it’s creator-friendly. These are rare qualities. We can vouch not only for the tech, but for the builders behind it.

We support this proposal and trust the community to weigh the valuation fairly. Yes, some concerns have been raised around the valuation, and we understand them, but ultimately, we believe this move isn’t about short-term numbers; it’s about long-term alignment.

This acquisition could mark a turning point for the Hub: a chance to bring in its first killer app, built by a proven team that has delivered. That’s not just a win for Stargaze — that’s a win for Cosmos Hub.

6 Likes

The proposal for Cosmos Hub to acquire Stargaze is not only financially excessive—it is strategically unsound. This is less an acquisition and more a golden bailout of a declining project, packaged with inflated metrics, risky assumptions, and a price tag that borders on delusional.

:police_car_light: Massive Overvaluation

Let’s begin with the headline number: 2.75 million ATOM requested for the STARS ➝ ATOM migration alone. That’s over $14 million at current prices for a token with a ~$3 million market cap and dwindling traction.

  • STARS price is pegged at a 200-day average of $0.00408, not the current market rate. Why? Because the current market clearly reflects where investors actually value it: significantly lower.
  • Including an arbitrary $3 million “customer acquisition cost” inflates this even further, essentially rewarding failure by equating Stargaze’s organic (and arguably flatlining) user base with what incentivized platforms spent.

This valuation is not just aggressive—it’s insane. Even if we accept some strategic value in the brand, tech stack, or user base, the premium being asked is well beyond reason.

:chart_decreasing: Declining Performance in a Receding Market

The proposal glosses over the reality: Stargaze is a downtrend project riding fading hype.

  • Mint volume has collapsed from ~$8M in 2022 to $270K YTD in 2025. That’s a >95% drop.
  • “Organic” usage claims ignore a broader market cooling and the fact that no meaningful new users are entering.
  • There’s no credible path to growth laid out—just assumptions that moving to the Hub and adding some IBC will magically reverse declining momentum.

:money_with_wings: Ballooning Monthly Costs with No Payoff in Sight

Stargaze is asking for $120K/month in team costs for a year, plus $250K/year to keep a frontend running. That’s nearly $1.7 million in additional cash burns just to “keep the lights on” during a transition.

That’s not lean—that’s bloated.

This is not a strategic acquisition with revenue synergies. It’s outsourcing Stargaze’s debt to the Cosmos Hub.

:test_tube: Unproven Tech Migration Risk

The proposal includes a high-risk, multi-stage technical migration with:

  • A total chain transition to proof-of-authority
  • Rewrites in Solidity
  • IBC routing and ICS-721 experimentation
  • A “Hub Genesis Mint” that is speculative at best

This is untested territory—Stargaze would effectively become a test subject for risky tech, funded by the Cosmos Hub.

:coin: Gross Misrepresentation of “Value”

The framing of “value to the Hub” includes:

  • Gas fees that are entirely theoretical and not guaranteed
  • “Brand assets” like NFTs with no intrinsic value to ATOM holders
  • A 5-year revenue share only after reaching $6M monthly volume—a target it has never consistently hit

This is like buying a decaying retail store because the paint looks nice and promising your shareholders it will become Amazon.

:fire_extinguisher: This is Not Strategic — It’s a Bailout

Let’s call it what it is:

  • Stargaze’s L1 model failed
  • Its token failed
  • It wants a new home with someone else footing the bill

This proposal amounts to a soft exit under the guise of a merger—except it’s the Cosmos Hub that’s left carrying the risk, cost, and uncertainty.

:cross_mark: Recommendation

Reject this proposal.

The Cosmos Hub’s community pool and treasury should be used for building the future, not subsidizing the past. We need high-leverage bets on interchain infrastructure, cross-chain liquidity, and security—not a vanity play for a sunset-stage NFT platform.

Stargaze had its moment. It is not the future of the Hub. This acquisition would saddle Cosmos Hub with a costly distraction and dilute the Hub’s strategic focus.

Overbloated salaries, burn rates exceeding revenue, collapsing mint volumes, a declining token, and an outrageous overvaluation—this isn’t a strategic acquisition, it’s a golden parachute. And to top it off, the Cosmos Hub wouldn’t even own the frontend it’s paying to keep online. Vote NO.

16 Likes

Is this your opinion, or is this what the AI thinks?

6 Likes

my opinion…

is that proposal real or AI generated?

3 Likes

Hard not to agree from a raw numbers perspective.

Curious to see how this plays out. Reading the room, seems many are in consensus that this is a really large price tag the community pool would be paying for a murky ROI thesis.

I would love to see SG on the Hub and take advantage of Eureka’s capabilities to expand beyond the borders of Cosmos, but the price has to be right. Stargaze’s back is against the wall economically and I respect Shane for doing what he can to do right for his team and community, but I think, unfortunately, they’re going to have to settle for much less in this case.

1 Like

It would be good to discuss the alternative as well.

What happens when the Hub does not acquire Stargaze? That is a question which needs to be answered as well. I would guess Stargaze would slowly fade into oblivion, which is a quite doomish and black scenario but also realistic. So not being acquired is not really an option for Stargaze imo.

A lot of take-overs for companies are done where the company that is taken over is thriving and growing in value. That justifies overpaying in some cases.
But this is different. We are talking about a project where valuation is declining and that is happening for a long time already. Just for reference, ATOM is up 16.3% over the past 30 days, whereas STARS is down 22.5%. That is a huge gap and a huge show of distrust in STARS as an asset.

In a lot of cases you can easily say that it indeed a bailout as @0xphilipp_eris is rightfully saying. If we want the Cosmos ecosystem to be relevant, we need to stop overpaying inferior stuff. I can imagine we go for a 1:1 conversion of STARS to ATOM and that is already quite generous, since we can expect that the STARS value will dwindle further over time. So holders will lose overall which would even justify a 1:0.XX conversion ratio.

Ofcourse you have to valuate the work already done, tech migrating, potential users (how much there really might be is to be discussed) and potential future value. But no way that it should be worth approx $15 million.

13 Likes