Thank you for providing the reasons that lead you to change your mind. It is genuinely hard to admit that we can be wrong sometimes. The fact that you did it is testimony to your faithful commitment to improve the chain. This episode is yet another example proving that data accuracy must be absolutely preserved in the forums.
Regarding data, we have to mention that we have a relatively similar argument in ICS rewards debate in this forum. You showed violent opposition to this, similarly questioning our motivations. Our intention is simply to collect data in anticipation to a forthcoming debate, avoiding problems encountered in other proposals where flawed data was also displayed. As proven once again in this post, wrong data leads to wrong decisions.
Despite that hiccup, we also want to encourage you to go further with the idea of mandating an “Arguments Against this Proposal” section in every proposal. This is a really good idea 