[RESOLVED][Signaling Proposal] : Retrieve all funds from Prop #101 back to CP

Bonjour,

La probabilité que cette adresse appartienne à un CEX est-elle de 100% ?

Si oui, je suis d’avis de clore le sujet, malheureusement.

Dans le cas contraire, il me semble nécessaire d’investiguer un peu plus profondément (si quelqu’un est qualifié dans les explorateur des blocks) . S’il s’avère que l’adresse appartient à un portefeuille chaud, qu’elle serait pour la procédure de récupération des fonds pas le CP ?

Merci de tenir ce sujet éveillé, il me semble qu’une énième demande de financement malicieuse qui serait acceptée pourrait être un coup d’arrêt au bon fonctionnement de cette gouvernance.

1 Like

Toute dépense du CP devrait avoir un retour de mise en œuvre dans la vie réelle, ce qui n’est pas le cas. La seule chose que je vois c’est de porter la “faute” sur celui qui a écrit et poussé la proposition on chain et de lui faire mauvaise publicité s’il ne dispose d’aucun moyen de pression pour la communication d’un quelconque compte rendu des dommagés.

1 Like

Nothing cam be done at this point. It is a lesson for future proposals and grants. We need more strict rules on who and for what purposes community pool assets are used.

Unfortunately this discussion didn’t bring too much attention and probably the half of the people that voted yes even forgot what they voted for.

2 Likes

The original funds are gone. I don’t like that it passed, but there’s nothing to be done at this point.

2 Likes

As people explained i don’t think we have any option. but the silence of @Imperator.co is definitely worrisome as they could have saved us a lot of time.

3 Likes

Wishing all of you well.

In light of recent events RE @ATOMAcceleratorDAO, it has come to my attention that Dilan Asatekin, Founder of @Imperator, is listed as being part of the DAO “Review” team.

Politely, and respectfully, requesting:

@ATOMAcceleratorDAO
@neshtedle (Review Committee Member)
@Mikey_Lee (Review Committee Member)

ping Dilan to respond to this post to provide the community clarity on Prop#101, please.

Though it still remains unclear whether or not this is a CEX address (cosmos1dm68mx9jcsyqkyzp3up7gmnu3ku84v8gf6v75u), according to Mintscan, the wallet where funds were transferred to now holds 227,495.16 IDLE ATOM.

Thank you, kindly.

*Edit: Will move this update to the original thread concerning Prop 101, as this direct signaling prop has been agreed to be resolved.

2 Likes

We need more responsibility and more thinking + less rules.

The amount of times the opinion about this particular prop was expressed in negative light is dozens. No rules can help if people make minds up.

It is truly unfortunate to see the well known validators, who voted in favor for this proposal to pass, remain silent.