Retroactive funding request

Although I don’t frequently disagree with you, I’ve got to say that I disagree with you here. I think that the community pool is a good thing that can do good things for Cosmos, and that it should stay in place. I also think that we should generally favor smaller funding, rather than larger funding.

Like yourself, I don’t really know what this proposal is about and so I’m inclined not to support it.

If it makes any difference to anybody I also like hemp, in cannabis form.

Edit: Grace clarified and let me know that what she’s actually saying is that we should empty the community pool and then have a 2% rate thereafter. In fact I think her solution is ideal, and we should Chase it.

@bpiv400 @Mag which of these solutions do you think is better?

If icl received 8.9 million atom, what would it do with them?

If the plan is decent I’d support this.

It’s also okay with me to burn em.

Thank you guys so much for your work on ethereum support, I think it’s going to bring tremendous things to the hub.

2 Likes