A.I. talk about Governance & DAOs


Well I guess a lot of us already heard about GPT-3 chat, but for those who don’t, that’s an open AI chat platform. Very helpful to summarize some complex information in a readable form for the normal human being.

I thought this would be interesting to share the recent chat I had with the AI on cryptos in general and then narrowing the scope to DAOs and their structuring. This was a hot topic there recently, so maybe having AI insight on the matter may help people to grasp what’s a stake.

[I skiped the initial part of the talk, where I gave the AI a context on crypto before moving to DAOs]

ME : any thoughts on DAOs ?

GPT : Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are digital organizations that are governed by a set of rules encoded into smart contracts and run on a blockchain. They are designed to be decentralized, meaning that they are not controlled by any single individual or entity, but are instead governed by the consensus of their members.

DAOs have gained a lot of attention in recent years because of their potential to enable more transparent, efficient, and democratic forms of governance and decision-making. They have the potential to disrupt traditional organizational models and to create new opportunities for collaboration and innovation.

However, it is important to note that DAOs are still a relatively new and untested concept, and there are many challenges and risks associated with their use. For example, DAOs are vulnerable to code vulnerabilities and attacks, and there have been instances where DAOs have been exploited or hacked. Additionally, there are questions about the legal status and accountability of DAOs, and it is not yet clear how they will be treated by regulators and the legal system.

Overall, DAOs are an interesting and promising concept, but they are also still in the early stages of development and adoption, and it is difficult to say for certain what the future holds for them.

ME : what could be the attack vectors against DAOs ?

GPT : There are several potential attack vectors that could be used to compromise a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO):

  1. Smart contract vulnerabilities: Like any smart contract, a DAO’s code is vulnerable to bugs and vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. For example, if a DAO’s code contains a vulnerability that allows an attacker to steal funds, the attacker could exploit that vulnerability to drain the DAO’s funds.
  2. Sybil attacks: In a Sybil attack, an attacker creates multiple fake identities and uses them to gain a disproportionate amount of influence within a DAO. This could allow the attacker to sway voting outcomes or to gain control of the DAO.
  3. Majority attack: If an attacker is able to gain control of a majority of the voting power within a DAO, they could use that power to manipulate voting outcomes and to control the DAO’s decisions.
  4. Frontrunning: In a frontrunning attack, an attacker monitors the blockchain for pending transactions and then executes their own transactions that depend on the outcome of those pending transactions before they are processed. This could allow the attacker to profit from the pending transactions or to disrupt the operation of the DAO.
  5. Phishing attacks: Like any online organization, a DAO is vulnerable to phishing attacks in which attackers use fake websites or emails to trick users into revealing their login credentials or private keys.

There are other potential attack vectors as well, and it is important for DAO developers and users to be aware of the risks and to take appropriate measures to protect themselves.

ME : what would be the best way to structure DAOs ?

GPT : There is no one “best” way to structure a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), as the optimal structure will depend on the specific goals and needs of the DAO. That being said, there are a few key considerations that can be helpful when designing the structure of a DAO:

  1. Decentralization: A key feature of DAOs is that they are decentralized, meaning that they are not controlled by any single individual or entity. It is important for the structure of a DAO to reflect this decentralization, for example by using a distributed governance model or by using a blockchain-based voting system.
  2. Transparency: DAOs should be designed to be transparent, so that all members have access to relevant information and can see how decisions are being made.
  3. Robustness: The structure of a DAO should be designed to be robust and resistant to attacks or disruptions. This may involve using multiple layers of security or implementing measures to mitigate the risks of vulnerabilities or Sybil attacks.
  4. Flexibility: A DAO’s structure should be flexible enough to allow it to adapt to changing needs or circumstances. This may involve using a modular design or implementing a system for on-chain governance.

There are many other factors that can also be important when designing the structure of a DAO, and it is important for DAO developers to carefully consider their specific goals and needs when designing the structure of their DAO.

ME : how could we improve the decentralization ?

GPT : There are a number of ways in which the decentralization of a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) can be improved:

  1. Distributed governance: A distributed governance model, in which decisions are made by a diverse group of stakeholders rather than by a single individual or entity, can help to increase the decentralization of a DAO.
  2. Blockchain-based voting: Using a blockchain-based voting system, such as a proof-of-stake (PoS) system, can help to ensure that voting is transparent, secure, and resistant to tampering.
  3. Use of multiple blockchain platforms: Using multiple blockchain platforms can help to increase the decentralization of a DAO by reducing the risk of a single point of failure.
  4. Decentralized infrastructure: Using decentralized infrastructure, such as decentralized file storage or decentralized DNS, can help to increase the overall decentralization of a DAO.
  5. Diversity of stakeholders: Ensuring that the stakeholders of a DAO are diverse and come from different backgrounds and locations can help to increase the decentralization of the DAO.

It is important to note that achieving a high degree of decentralization can be challenging, and it may involve trade-offs with other considerations such as scalability and efficiency.

ME : should cosmos blockchains run with DAOs ?

GPT : Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) can be built on top of the Cosmos platform, and it is possible for Cosmos-based blockchains to incorporate DAO functionality into their design. However, it is not necessary for all Cosmos-based blockchains to use DAOs, and the decision to use a DAO will depend on the specific goals and needs of the blockchain.

DAOs have the potential to provide a transparent, efficient, and democratic form of governance and decision-making, and they can be useful for a wide range of applications. However, they also have their own set of risks and challenges, and it is important for blockchain developers to carefully consider whether a DAO is the right choice for their particular use case.

In general, the decision to use a DAO or not will depend on the specific needs and goals of the blockchain, as well as the trade-offs that the developers are willing to make in terms of decentralization, security, scalability, and other factors.

ME : what kind of trade-offs ?

GPT : There are a number of trade-offs to consider when deciding whether to use a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) on a blockchain:

  1. Decentralization vs. efficiency: One trade-off to consider is the balance between decentralization and efficiency. DAOs can provide a decentralized and transparent form of governance, but they may also be slower and less efficient than more centralized alternatives.
  2. Security vs. complexity: Another trade-off to consider is the balance between security and complexity. DAOs can be more secure than centralized alternatives, but they can also be more complex to design and manage.
  3. Flexibility vs. stability: DAOs can be designed to be highly flexible, but this can also make them less stable. On the other hand, more rigid structures may be more stable, but less flexible.
  4. Legal and regulatory uncertainty: There is still a lot of uncertainty around the legal and regulatory status of DAOs, which can be a risk for organizations that decide to use them.

These are just a few examples of the trade-offs that may be involved in the decision to use a DAO, and it is important for organizations to carefully consider their specific goals and needs when deciding whether a DAO is the right choice for them.


I hope anybody reading that thread will have a clearer vision on the matter thanks to that chat !


Dont wanna advertise. But you should really check what cyber_devs aka bostrom aka cyber are doing. I think you might have a lot to commit to there and a lot of info to exchange

This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.