Your profile is created not so long time ago, and most of your posts, is write the same shit in topics that is created by me
You account is one more multi-account paid by Cosmos Labs
Mate, I wanna be honest with you - everything you see here and read is not real, thatâs matrix and we are all living in your head⌠we just a part of your consciousnessâŚ
Nobody interested in honest of private multi-account
This is a topic not about your honesty
Stop to spam, and if you write something here - write about topic
Nobody interested in your private out of personality
Bla bla bla bla
Kindly waiting for your new âgreatâ prop
All those, who think that we need tech, not marketing: look at the power of marketing
No tech behind Pingui
Lmao took 5 sec to see that thereâs a huge amount of bots following their page.
Even though i would like to see a discussion about marketing efforts on this forum, this proposal is poisened by the violation of governance integrity. I would even suggest to close this thread at this point.
2 Likes
This is what ICF and Cosmos Labs do with Cosmos:
Of course this proposal will be updated, and we will offer new draft proposal with more details about Cosmos Hub development
Visibility is helpful, but visibility alone doesnât convert developers. Solana didnât grow because of ads, it grew because of tooling, funding, reference applications, Superteam, and a clear path for devs to build something meaningful. If we care about attracting builders, we need onboarding infrastructure, not just exposure. Promotion without support leads to churn, not retention. Marketing amplifies ecosystems that are ready. It doesnât repair ecosystems that arenât
1 Like
My take on the why there are no devs, question is much simpler than people make it. Itâs not just a visibility or marketing problem. The reality is that maybe 1% of developers in the space actually understand Cosmos tech at a level where they can build something meaningful on it. And even fewer are comfortable with Rust or Go, which are amazing languages for real systems engineering, but not popular entry points for Web3 beginners. Cosmos is extremely powerful, but itâs also extremely advanced. It asks people to build sovereign chains, not just deploy tokens or copy and paste solidity contracts. Most developers today are application oriented, not protocol oriented. Most are looking for fast iterations, quick UX, and an ecosystem that supports experimentation without reading research papers. And most users in the current crypto market are even more extreme, they donât want to understand anything. They want price action, narratives, and speculation. They want to pump their bags, not study interoperability models. So from my perspective, the issue isnât that Cosmos is lacking hype, itâs that itâs ahead of its audience. The tech is beautiful, but it intimidates beginners and doesnât reward short term speculators. Until the middle layer tooling, onboarding, docs, abstractions catches up, marketing alone wonât fix the gap. Thatâs why you canât market people into understanding something theyâre not ready for yet.
3 Likes
Who is going to draw a path, build tooling and reference applications? Chicken-and-egg problem
Building contracts or communicating with a chain is way easier in Cosmos than in Solana.
Multi-chain token manipulation is where it gets complex but itâs needed for certain apps only
Building contracts or communicating with a chain might be easier in Cosmos than in Solana, only for certain tasks. But the point isnât just the individual transaction complexity, itâs the overall ecosystem IBC, sovereign chains, staking and governance. These are advanced concepts that most devs and new users still find intimidating. Marketing alone wonât solve this tooling, guides, and reference apps are still needed to bridge the gap
2 Likes
Well said. Attracting people before you are ready for them can be a set back because they show up, see there is nothing there they can use yet, and now youâve made a bad first impression and they are more likely to cross you off their mental list of options.
1 Like
Friends! Thank you for your feedback, we will update proposal, will add more details about marketing campaign, also we will add more information about supporting tooling and services to create additinal utility for ATOM, also we will add plans to update tokenomics, and of course we will clearify moment with delegations to validators!
After it, a new draft proposal will be created on forum, to discuss it, and maybe to update it, or to accept to publish it.
For now, this topic can be closed, as we get enough feedback, and now we know how to make this proposal better!
Thank you for constructive feedback!
1 Like