[PROPOSAL ##][DRAFT] Initiate a Community Pool Staking Program

[FHZ]

@Syed

Could actual skin-in-the-game (aka self bond) be a criteria?

@Govmos

Requiring self-bonding would exclude smaller validators — often those operating at breakeven or a loss — and contradict the inclusive purpose of the program.

Agreed with Validators to self bond as a criteria.

If larger, more established validators are being inclusive by rightfully watching out for smaller validators, have these higher ranked teams voluntarily donate their own self-stake/rewards/etc. to provide aid. The new 2% tax rate should sufficiently help fund this initiative.

@Govmos

We believe this proposal provides a sustainable, math-based framework to fund grant programs indefinitely, without ever depleting the CP’s principal.

Although this working proposal aims to create a sustainably interesting program, which we should appreciate, let us simply:

@waqarmmirza

Adjust the Tax rate.

Lastly,

@Govmos

The funds are entirely controlled by on-chain governance,

Yet, we just witnessed:

@Neutron

the Neutron Foundation has committed to return 50,000 ATOM received as part of Proposal 72 to the Cosmos Hub Community Pool.