Unclear on what you’re implying here. Conflicts of interest exists when private gain trumps duty. And yes, I’m in support of a motion to end a source of “paycheck” with velocity and transparency bc it’s the right thing to do. That’s weird?
Suffice it to say, your incorrect application and definition of “conflict” above, is both strange and well, revealing.
I’ve been privately and publicly asking for a clear plan since Nov 2024: define what “sunset” actually means and spell out the execution plan. Transparency Report #9 (April) laid out why we need a wind-down plan and how it must be communicated. Core contributors kept promising they’d “get to it,” month after month. I warned them they needed to get ahead of growing frustration before it gets ripe. Well, it got ripe, and now there a post. Also unclear why it’s an issue if the conversation is further advanced by community. Think it’s healthy.
My compensation at $75/hr has been public since the first Transparency Report following my election. In general, my role is limited to 35% FTE pm. Since joining Oversight in May 2024, I consistently worked more than 35% FTE hrs. On the rare occasions the workload really pushed past that cap (e.g., 50-60% FTE), I told the community here first (and context for what) and was paid exactly what I disclosed. No surprises, no secrets.
Since maintenance mode, Oversight is paid on a sliding scale, anywhere from 20% to 35% FTE, strictly pegged to hours worked. I elected to do this bc I think it’s more fair. No one told me to do it.
Whereas, the core team gets paid a flat 40% FTE rate every month since January 2025, whether or not they actually perform such hours (16 hrs per week).
Source: TR9
As to what “measurable outcomes” I’ve delivered for the Hub – I somehow managed to get elected to the Oversight Committee despite certain teams campaigning against me w unsportsmanlike conduct lol. My contributions in the capacity of oversight are kinda self evident. Just read the forum.