At Govmos, we firmly believe that the DAO’s internal decision to sunset its operations, as determined through a DAODAO vote, should be fully respected. This reflects the organization’s acknowledgment of the challenges faced and the impossibility of continuing under the current framework.
This is particularly troubling. Oversight should act as a safeguard, not as an impediment. The suggestion that it has obstructed operations raises concerns about the extent to which oversight may have overstepped its original mandate. Additionally, any attempt to maintain control by replacing members while retaining the same structure only exacerbates these issues.
We strongly oppose any effort to “revamp” the AADAO by replacing its members and continuing under the current framework. Once the DAO’s remaining activities have been finalized as outlined in the sunset roadmap, all members should be dissolved. If the community wishes to pursue a new grant DAO with a revised mandate, it must be built from the ground up as an entirely new entity.
The conflicts between the DAO and its oversight structure serve as a significant red flag against attempting to restart the current DAO under any form. These issues stem from the rigid hierarchical structure, which proved to be a fundamental flaw. Instead, we advocate for rebuilding with a more decentralized and collaborative system.
Thank you for your attention.
Govmos.
