Cosmos_Nanny:
Did you interpret a “YES” vote on Proposal 865 as constituting approval of all policies within the linked documents, e.g., the “AADAO Performance and Retention Bonus Protocol ”?
In your opinion, does the passage of a proposal implicitly ratify all linked documents and their contents, or should such ratifications be more explicit? Furthermore, how is the sufficiency of document linkage determined, and where should such links be presented?
Was it explicitly clear that the 100,000 ATOM bonus allocation for “Performance and Retention” could be utilized as compensation tools supplementing monthly salaries?
Is it appropriate to use the bonus pool for contributor performance that “meets expectations” or must it be used for performance that “exceeds expectations” or more?
PLEASE provide responses for the above if you haven’t done so already. It’s very important. Oversight fundamentally has disagreements with Core DAO wrt what was “approved” as per proposal 865. Thank you
1 Like