At Govmos, we strongly resonate with @Noam’s point regarding the utility of ATOM for liquidity provision without the need for selling it. A perfect example of this would be Hydro. Alongside this, we support the ICF’s updated approach to funding development work. However, the Hub’s reliance on community pool for certain specific funding still exists, Hydro is another example to this point, as the current discussion in this forum seeks CP funds to source operations for 2025.
In light of these elements, we recommend maintaining the current funding rate. Reductions should only be considered if evidence suggests oversized budget within the CP, which is not apparent today.