You should veto because informal systems actively retaliates against security research.
Informal has never demonstrated an understanding of the issue that I reported, and was involved in the public report which allowed @Rarma to so easily create a viable strategy to stop the hub.
In addition to that, when the governance proposal was made, there was no discussion of the ICF being involved. The CEO of Informal systems is also the vice president of the ICF so it is hard to believe that they had no knowledge of it while drafting the proposal .
If the Icf sincerely wishes to fund hub development, instead of just tossing money at informal then freedom for the hub team should be nbd.